Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

IMPORTANT NOTICE FOR FREEPERS WITH FIREARMS!Akins Accelerator(tm) reclassified as NFA by BATFE
Atkins Accelerator (TM) ^ | 13 DEC 06 | dcbryan1

Posted on 12/13/2006 12:22:37 PM PST by DCBryan1

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 161-164 next last
To: DCBryan1; ASA Vet
Bad
Attitude
Towards
Freedom
61 posted on 12/13/2006 7:14:47 PM PST by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: DCBryan1
Anyone working for the BATFE is now an ememy of the Republic.

As if those jackbooted mass murderers weren't already...

62 posted on 12/13/2006 7:21:21 PM PST by FierceDraka (Army Dad, And Damned Proud Of It!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Last Laugh
I never understood how Reno got away with that. Or the Clinton Admin. too, come to think of it.

Oh that's easy!

The MSM was too busy bending over backwards and forwards for the Clinton Administration, and nothing they did was base or vulgar enough to merit wasting broadcast time harping over.

Shoot an unarmed women holding a baby in the the head? Incinerate a house full of women and children? Put a bullet in the head of a wayward staffer in a park? Oh, pshaw! It was all for the children, don't ya know! /sarc

But an American soldier in Iraq shoots an al-Quaeda terrorist holding a hand grenade, and it's time to roll out the investigations, get the lawyers working on pressing charges, and get Matt Lauer to put on his sad face and cry for the cameras!

(check the tagline and you'll understand)

63 posted on 12/13/2006 7:51:05 PM PST by FierceDraka (Army Dad, And Damned Proud Of It!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: SENTINEL

Any chance the SCOTUS will see this in the future?

NRA, WHERE THE HELL ARE YOU!?!?!?!?!


64 posted on 12/13/2006 7:59:59 PM PST by BigTom85 (Proud Gun Owner and Member of NRA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: All
DO NOT POST ANY INFORMATION REGARDING ANY WEAPONS YOU OWN, OR HAVE STASHED AWAY ANYWHERE!

REMEMBER - ANYTHING POSTED ON THE INTERNET IS PUBLIC KNOWLEDGE, TRACEABLE BY IP ADDRESS AND SERVICE PROVIDER, AND IS AVAILABLE TO LOCAL, STATE, AND FEDERAL LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES AS PROBABLE CAUSE FOR A SEARCH WARRANT AND/OR EVIDENCE

Just thought it would be appropriate to shout that out in bold caps. Only stupid teenagers put evidence on the Net for all too see. You don't want to be a stupid teenager, do you?

This has been a Public Service Announcement from your friendly neighborhood Drakensis.

(Paranoid? Absolutely. Caught? Never.)

65 posted on 12/13/2006 8:01:12 PM PST by FierceDraka (Army Dad, And Damned Proud Of It!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Last Laugh
Start? I have not stopped since 9-11. ;)

Same here.. I am actually going to buy another 12 gauge this weekend. Looking into the Mossberg model 88. Nothing great... but its another noise maker to add to the collection. When the sh*t hits the fan, it will be just as deadly as my 870!
66 posted on 12/13/2006 8:02:58 PM PST by BigTom85 (Proud Gun Owner and Member of NRA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: FierceDraka
(Paranoid? Absolutely. Caught? Never.)

This message has been brought to you by Paranoia.

Paranoia, keeping otherwise reasonable beings alive since the beginning of time.



Accept no substi.....Who are you and what do you want?!?
67 posted on 12/13/2006 8:10:56 PM PST by Dr.Zoidberg (Mohammedism - Bringing you only the best of the 6th century for fourteen hundred years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
However, I STILL think the Constitution took a major hit when they (in effect) outlawed machine guns, and they never should've done it. They had no right to do it, and I'm still highly ticked off about it!

Taken in an historical context, the machine gun ban was enacted at a time when the Evile Bootleggers were using Tommy guns against the Feds trying to stop them from distributing their (illegal and then unconstitutional) Devil Alcohol.

In a very real sense, we can thank that psychotic, beer-barrel-smashing harpy Carrie Nation and her co-conspiritors of the Women's Christian Temperance Movement for taking away Americans' beer and liquor, and shoving Prohibition down their throats instead

That created a criminal black market, and eventually (through the National Firearms Act enacted to fight bootleggers) deprived law-abiding American citizens of any real means of resisting Federal overreach, creeping totalitarianism, and tyranny.

As always, it was a case of bustling busybodies with nothing better to do screaming "it's for the children", and the unintended consequences of their actions resulting a century later in One Nation, Under Absolute Government, With Tyranny and Injustice For All.

68 posted on 12/13/2006 8:23:35 PM PST by FierceDraka (Army Dad, And Damned Proud Of It!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: BigTom85
Any chance the SCOTUS will see this in the future?

SCOTUS is now nothing more than a rubber-stamp court for the Federal bureaucracy now.

They may talk the talk in interviews, but when it comes time to vote, it's "All Power To The State!" on cases regarding individual liberty these days.

I invite anyone here to prove me wrong. Please prove me wrong! For the gods' sake, prove me wrong!

69 posted on 12/13/2006 8:31:49 PM PST by FierceDraka (Army Dad, And Damned Proud Of It!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Dr.Zoidberg
Paranoia, keeping otherwise reasonable beings alive since the beginning of time.

Damn straight.

See no evil, speak no evil, hear no evil.

70 posted on 12/13/2006 8:45:26 PM PST by FierceDraka (Army Dad, And Damned Proud Of It!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: FierceDraka

Looks like we are well on our way to a police state. Federal bureaucracy running wild.


71 posted on 12/13/2006 8:46:41 PM PST by BigTom85 (Proud Gun Owner and Member of NRA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: FierceDraka
Shoot an unarmed women holding a baby in the the head?

Unfortunately, King William's predecessor in office gets credit for that one. It happened in August, 1992.

72 posted on 12/13/2006 9:00:10 PM PST by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: DCBryan1

They did it because the Rats took power in Congress, and the Rats will have their back.


73 posted on 12/13/2006 9:13:51 PM PST by Thunder90
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DCBryan1

The BATFE and the Rats would call any semi-automatic rifle a machine gun if given the chance.


74 posted on 12/13/2006 9:43:04 PM PST by Thunder90
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FierceDraka
Good points. I had never thought of it in that way.


75 posted on 12/13/2006 11:49:36 PM PST by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: harpseal; TexasCowboy; AAABEST; Travis McGee; Squantos; Shooter 2.5; wku man; SLB; ...
Click the Gadsden flag for pro-gun resources!
76 posted on 12/14/2006 5:16:42 AM PST by Joe Brower (The Constitution defines Conservatism. *NRA*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Last Laugh
You'd think the Government would put a "Grandfather" clause on those who have already legally purchased it.

They can't. Federal code 922(o) flatly forbids all MGs made after 1986.

The problem with the Accellerator is (like most stupidly/unconstitutionally regulated technologies) it falls on the blurry edge of what is/isn't a MG. It's up to BATFE to examine new devices and determine which side of the line they're on; the Accelerator is not clearly on either side, so at first they said it's ok, but with further analysis of design & real-world use they decided it is, for all practical legalistic purposes, a MG - so they have to ban it, and do so retroactively.

Just another example of why prohibition is wrong.

77 posted on 12/14/2006 7:25:18 AM PST by ctdonath2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Comment #78 Removed by Moderator

To: SENTINEL

It's not an ex-post-facto issue. Law 922(o) has existed >20 years. It just took BATFE a while and a few attempts to decide whether that law applied to a new product. BATFE is simply (and sometimes badly) interpreting laws, not writing them.


79 posted on 12/14/2006 7:29:03 AM PST by ctdonath2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: DCBryan1
Why are you suprised? They claim that a reciever (the part itself) is a firearm even though it won't do anything without other parts. They also claim that a shoestring is a machinegun. I have seen other cases where they have done things like this before. This is exactly why I hope that the USSC hears the Hollis “Wayne” Fincher case. He may just convince them that NFA '34 (and other gun control laws) is unconstitutional, which would put an end to the BATFE's BS like this.
80 posted on 12/14/2006 7:30:41 AM PST by looscnnn ("Olestra (Olean) applications causes memory leaks" PC Confusious)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 161-164 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson