Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judge upholds detainee rights terror law
Associated Press ^ | December 13, 2006 | Matt Apuzzo

Posted on 12/13/2006 1:50:24 PM PST by Zakeet

WASHINGTON - A federal judge upheld the Bush administration's new terrorism law Wednesday, agreeing that Guantanamo Bay detainees do not have the right to challenge their imprisonment in U.S. courts.

The ruling by U.S. District Judge James Robertson rejects a legal challenge by Salim Ahmed Hamdan, a former driver for Osama bin Laden whose case prompted the Supreme Court to strike down the Bush administration's policy on detainees last year.

Following that ruling, Bush pushed for and got a new law that established military commissions to try enemy combatants and stripped them of the right to seek their freedom in U.S. courts.

Robertson said Congress clearly intended to keep cases such as Hamdan's out of federal courts and, because of that, he no longer has jurisdiction to hear it.

The ruling is a legal victory for the Bush administration, which has been fending off criticism of the new law from Democrats and civil libertarians.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: courts; detainee; enemycombatant; gitmo; judiciary; wot

US District Court Judge Robertson was appointed by Clinton to the DC District.

1 posted on 12/13/2006 1:50:29 PM PST by Zakeet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

what's this - Hamdans appeal against the NEW law?


2 posted on 12/13/2006 1:52:40 PM PST by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oceanview

This judge is a radical leftist. We dodged a bullet.


3 posted on 12/13/2006 1:57:10 PM PST by holdonnow (we)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: holdonnow
"This judge is a radical leftist. We dodged a bullet."

Well, it's not like this guy accidentally pushed the wrong button.

He maybe liberal but it sounds like he is intellectually honest.
4 posted on 12/13/2006 3:05:31 PM PST by ndt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: holdonnow

hey Mark!

what is the context here, I thought the Hamdan case was decided? this is his challenge to the new law, but how is the new law affecting him - wasn't his case decided before it went into effect?


5 posted on 12/13/2006 8:01:45 PM PST by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson