Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mr. Silverback
Conservatives have been reading way too much into the political demise of some moderates in the last election. Those moderates were vulnerable in states with burgeoning democrat constituencies.

What was more telling was the loss of the conservatives, in conservative districts.

In the next cycle, those moderates will not be there. The next cycle will show that it is Republicans in general, saddled now with the label of "republican=conservative", are a threatened species.

205 posted on 12/15/2006 10:56:53 AM PST by Cold Heat ("Ward!.........Go easy on the beaver"!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 196 | View Replies ]


To: Cold Heat
I didn't read anything into losses by moderates. I made a conclusion by looking at the victories won by Blue Dogs. They won because they acted like social conservative Republicans, not because their opponents were moderates or conservatives.

Every election cycle the line we hear from libs and faux libertarians is one of the following:

"The GOP won because of fundamentalist voters who came out to vote on (insert social issue here)."

"The GOP lost because not enough voters like the social issues they stand for, such as (insert social issue here)."

Click here for details of how this song was sung after the 2004 election.

Sorry, not buying.

208 posted on 12/15/2006 11:20:16 AM PST by Mr. Silverback (We need to crush the Iraq Study Group like we crushed Harriet Miers. Let fly!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 205 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson