ABSURDITY OF HILLARY (What the media and Dick Morris aren't telling us about Obama-clinton numbers.)

Vanity | 12.16.06 | Mia T

[E.G.C.]

BTTT

[Mia T]

thanx, E.G.C. :)

[yoe]

Dick Morris is and always has been a Snake in the Grass; a gossipy fat little toad whose face gives him away as he relishes his ‘insider’ tidbits. O’Reilly should take a closer look at this pundit whose demeanor is as classless as the Clintons, sort of a male Hedda Hopper or Joan Rivers - I am ashamed to say, I listen to him because of his distaste for Hillary….he is preaching to my part of the choir…………….

[Mia T]

Morris is, above all else, a self-promoter. He says 9/11 changed him. He also says he repeatedly warned the clintons about terrorism, claiming to have [rightly] identified fighting terrorism as THE policy that would have produced the legacy clinton is always desperately seeking [but, of course, will never achieve].

KILL BILL: AN UNINTENDED APPRAISAL OF THE CLINTON YEARS?
'KILL BILL'
THE CLINTON-FOLEY NEXUS: A THEORY
by Mia T, 10.05.06

 

I M P E A C H M E N T
h e a r --c l i n t o n --l o s e --i t


by Mia T, 11.11.05

This legacy confab is in and of itself proof certain of clinton's deeply flawed character, and a demonstration in real time of the way in which the clinton years were about a legacy that was incidentally a presidency.

Madeleine Albright captured the essence of this dysfunctional presidency best when she explained why clinton couldn't go after bin Laden.

According to Richard Miniter, the Albright revelation occurred at the cabinet meeting that would decide the disposition of the USS Cole bombing by al Qaeda [that is to say, that would decide to do what it had always done when a "bimbo" was not spilling the beans on the clintons: Nothing]. Only Clarke wanted to retaliate militarily for this unambiguous act of war.

Albright explained that a [sham] Mideast accord would yield [if not peace for the principals, surely] a Nobel Peace Prize for clinton. Kill or capture bin Laden and clinton could kiss the 'accord' and the Peace Prize good-bye.

If clinton liberalism, smallness, cowardice, corruption, perfidy--and, to borrow a phrase from Andrew Cuomo, clinton cluelessness--played a part, it was, in the end, the Nobel Peace Prize that produced the puerile pertinacity that enabled the clintons to shrug off terrorism's global danger.

READ MORE

WHY DID BILL CLINTON IGNORE TERRORISM?
Was it simply the constraints of his liberal mindset, or was it something even more threatening to our national security?

by Mia T, 8.18.05

thanx to jla and Wolverine for the audio



CLINTON: 'Can we kill 'em tomorrow?'
(+ Albright-Fulbright-Nobel TERRORISM revelations)





UNITED 93:THE CLINTON-9/11 NEXUS
"We have to do it now. We know what happens if we just sit here and do nothing...."

[Mia T]

Love your reptilian, gossipy description. Your take on Dick Morris' blood temperature and desire to be in the know is right-on. ;)

What is particularly interesting are allegations that Time changed its intended Sept. 9 cover featuring Dick Morris after the president expressed displeasure. The cover story described in detail Morris' extensive power in the White House.

Sherry Rowlands, Morris' call girl, told Star that on Aug. 22, four days before the Time issue hit the stands, she overheard Morris speaking with Clinton on the phone about the cover. Morris told Clinton the cover would either depict Morris inside Clinton's head as his "brain," or Morris would be pictured leading Clinton. After Clinton blew up in anger, Rowlands told Star, she heard Morris say "Yes, sir, I'll call them about it -- it's not too late ... I'm sorry, sir. I'll call them immediately." Star quotes Morris, via Rowlands, as telling Time's editor "Well, I told you he's against it.... He is the president. And -- I don't mean to tell you your place -- but you're just an editor." The final cover was a photo-illustration of a miniature Morris perched on Clinton's shoulder with the caption "The Man Who Has Clinton's Ear."

Time will not tell

[Nancee]

BUMP!!!

[Northern Yankee]

I still don't see hellary getting the nomination. Too far away for this hype to be happening now.

I also don't trust dick morris. Something not quite right about this person. I'd say man, but that's reserved for men of honor and character.

Good Morning!

[Nancee]

"I also don't trust dick morris. Something not quite right about this person. I'd say man, but that's reserved for men of honor and character."

I just don't know what to think of him. But I would agree with your point on men of honor and character. Anyone who has spent that much time helping Bill Clinton has substantial problems!!

Good morning to you, too!

[johnny7]

The DBM proved once again in November that coordinated, 24/7 propaganda applied over 2-3 years can persuade the sheeple to vote Dhimmicrat... or a least, stay home on election day. Unless we get a candidate who is exceptional at rallying the vast-uninformed around a core of critical, conservative issues... we will lose out again in 2008.

By having FOX News, the Internet and Rush Limbaugh as the only mass outlets for conservative/Republican exposure... we are doomed to at least begin each election... from behind the 8-ball.

[Mia T]

We mustn't sit idly by for 2 years like Bush did. We've got to coalesce, focus and attack. We mustn't merely respond (which we must and instantly); we must go on the offensive. The clintons are a defect-rich target. We must go after them relentlessly.

Whoever is the R candidate must forget the stupid, losing strategy of not attacking the witch. She must be attacked non-stop AND WITH FACTS.

We must concentrate on the clinton failure to fight terrorism, on the clinton treason, on the clinton corruption and on the clinton abuse of women and on their abuse of power, generally. (Rape isn't a 'personal' issue... and as clinton failure to confront terrorism demonstrates, character IS EVERYTHING.)

[Mia T]

You may be right. The Ds have to wake up and get some moxie, tho. (The smart D money is already anti-hillary. That is what Obama is, in part, about. His numbers came right off the top from hillary's prior numbers... see the Fox poll.)

[Northern Yankee]

Thanks.

You do a great job!

[Mia T]

I dunno. But I do think there is still some strange connection with bill clinton.

[Mia T]

thank you :)

[Vermont Lt]

Lots of stuff here. But hardly anyone will read it. You have done a lot of work, but take a minute and try to organize this better. It is not very well presented. How about your break it down and just post a few links at a time. This hurts my eyes.

[Mia T]

Did you ever see a candidate with so much baggage and who is so congenitally unlikeable forced on a major political party? It is bizarre.

[Ditter]

I am in awe of your purity!

>//>sarc/>

[Mia T]

Thanks for your constructive criticism. (But you are wrong about traffic to these posts. They generally google in the top ten for matters clinton.)

e.g., google 'virtual kill' or 'hillary juanita' or 'clinton terrorism' or 'kill em tomorrow'

[Northern Yankee]

Did you ever see a candidate with so much baggage and who is so congenitally unlikeable forced on a major political party? It is bizarre.

It is curious.

I continue to ask, what in the world has she accomplished that isn't self serving? She married Bubba, and even that "marriage" isn't authentic. It slays me to see people that don't choose to see beyond what's there.

Then again all I need do is look at Nazi Germany. How in the world could a Hitler possibly gain power as he did. History does have a way of repeating itself. Fortunately there are now more avenues and opinions out there in the media that will not be cowed into following the crowd.

Thanks again for all you do to keep the torch burning. I stand in awe.

[Wolverine]

bump