Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: NormsRevenge

I can solve California's problems quickly and easily, with "The Singapore Solution."

In Singapore many offenses, no matter how small, are punishable with a fine instead of jail time. Fines for every annoying or offensive behavior.

In California, every single police officer should be issuing fines right, left and sideways. They should have something like a cellphone for swiping credit cards for on-the-spot fines. The State gets the majority of the fine, then the county, then the city get their share, depending on the jurisdiction of the police officer.

People who refuse to pay could have the fine deducted automatically from any bank account, and if the fine amount is over $1000, they work at the rate of one day per $100 to pay it back, mostly picking up litter.

All fines would be based on State law, and would not be *criminal* offenses, but *civil* offenses, which means that they first had to be appealed through a State fines officer, whose primary job is to prevent corruption in the fining system. Alternatively, if payment of the fine was refused, the violation would be prosecuted under normal criminal law as it is now.

In essence, this would amount to an huge tax on that part of the middle class and wealthy who are offensive. Vehicle citations, vandalism, shoplifting, simple assault, littering, just about anything else that is petty and annoying would pour money into the State and local coffers.

In turn, it would result in large cost savings, in not having to arrest, try or jail people. And since the fines would be the only punishment, they would need to fit the crime.

For example, what if for DUI you had to pay $30,000? Many people who couldn't afford it would vie for the jail time and a lesser fine. But a lot would pay $30k or more to not go to jail.

Since California *convicts* about 130,000 DUI drivers every year, and assuming 100k of them would pay up, that is $3M dollars into the State treasury, less any paid to counties and cities. For *one* crime.

And there are thousands of crimes that could be punished with just instant fines. Think of all the traffic laws. If you had the choice to pay $75 and get points on your license and have your insurance go up, or $300 and drive away, how many people would pay the greater amount? You might even save money in the deal.

Put it all together and California might even get their budget in the black for a change. Make a bundle, save a bundle. It starts to add up.


6 posted on 12/18/2006 8:25:27 AM PST by Popocatapetl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Popocatapetl

For example, what if for DUI you had to pay $30,000? Many people who couldn't afford it would vie for the jail time and a lesser fine. But a lot would pay $30k or more to not go to jail.



You appear to have been the recipient of a government education. Perhaps I can help:

$30,000 each times 100,000 DUI offenders =
(count the zeros)
$3,000,000,000
which is $3 BILLION, not $3 million.


9 posted on 12/18/2006 11:31:35 AM PST by Mack the knife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson