Replies

Post 28:

["The real liars are having a hard time in court."]

Oric didn't have such a "hard time in court."

Think before you write.

Post 31:

["You're right! I'll think a lot harder before I post the next time."]

Nice to hear that, and don't give me Wikipeida stuff.

Use your own head...but of course I may be asking too much.

***What part of he was “CONVICTED” is hard for you to understand? YOU ARE WRONG understand? Wrong, as in definitively 100% factually provable incorrect in your statement that he the court case went his way. Even when I attempts to sarcastically get my point across to you it goes right over your head! So I'll be more blunt: You are full of shit. Oric was found guilty.

Let me repost it, in the hopes that you might get it the third or fourth time you read it.

"As of March 16, 2006, the ICTY had indicted 161 persons. Only six of these remained "at large". The cases against 85 of the indicted had been concluded: 43 were found guilty, 8 acquitted, 25 had their indictments withdrawn, and six had died - 3 of these in custody, 3 while on parole. Four cases had been sent to national courts for trial. 15 of those convicted had completed their sentences and been released by March 2006.[1] ( http://www.un.org/icty/glance-e/index.htm )

According to ICTY's very own team there were 102,000 deaths in Bosnia. proportionaly split per capita between Serbs, Croats and Muslims (both factions).

Yet, out of 161 indicted, the bulk are Serbs. Out of 3 who died in custody ALL are Serbs. Out of those who were allowed to leave ICTY before the trial and being in good health, none are Serbs.

ICTY's brazen claim "BRINGING JUSTICE TO THE FORMER YUGOSLAVIA" is tantamount to Dr Kavorkian bringing health to his patients.

ICTY was created as a political tool with a goal to "punish Serbian agresssion". "Agression" that was invented in political circles.

A court dispensing political tools is not a judicary institution. It is a court, like Hitler's peoples courts and Stalin trials.

Red,

http://www.shofar.de/labeling-e.html The PR images of "Serbs as Nazis" became accepted as fact, even though the leaders of supposed "victims" were an Islamic fundamentalist and a Neo-Nazi Holocaust denier!

Clinton saw himself as "FDR", Blair as "Churchill", and the ICTY as "Nurenburg". All those countries that let the Jews down during WWII, wanted to prove that "genocide would not be tolerated" this time -- even if no genocide was taking place in the Balkans and the "defenseless victims" were "anything but that" Muslims:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1753444/posts

http://www.sky.com/skynews/video/videoplayer/0,,91134-bosnia_p3705,00.html

The ICTY is a kangaroo court where they make up "laws" as they prosecute, and not before -- they base these "laws" around what sort of case that they think that they can make against a indictee after the fact, not before. It's so bad that even the US will not allow it's citizens to be governed by a "World Court". The purpose of these UN Courts are nothing more than to justify writing history from the victors point of view. The people involved in prosecuting this are not heroes, they are narcisstic villains.

Our involvement in Balkan politics has yielded nothing for us except embarassment (we don't accept a World Court to prosecute us, but we expect you little countries to agree to it!) and grief (we gave al Qaeda a new base in Europe) -- we got our "thanks" for saving Muslims on 9/11.

The whole situation is a sick farce.

["What part of he was “CONVICTED” is hard for you to understand?...Even when I attempts to sarcastically get my point across to you it goes right over your head!"]

No Red6, I think maybe my comment went over your head.

Let me try it this way. Can you explain to me why Carla del Ponte is appealing the TWO year sentence given to Oric by the international court? Remember, the prosecution asked that Oric get eighteen years.

I hope I'm clear now (sigh).