Replies

1. So the pictures are from what and when and where? Bad pictures = bad NATO? More arguments based on BS.

2. In WWII we bombed the snot out of Germany. Thousands died. Was that wrong? Again, you are playing a game where you intentionally make the water murky to make some bogus point.

Your arguments are all the same. Emotional, lack of facts, speculative, full of fallacies....... loys of polemics. But no substance. Serbia was told to stop, they were told to stop again and again and again. They didn't. The UN was impotent and eventually upon request of several NATO countries (i.e. Germany and Great Britain) NATO became involved. Serbia after the break up of YU had the military might. They were the aggressor, they were the ones calling the shots. The Serbs complaining they were bombed is like the a German whining about Dresden. The Serbs created a mess. Germany alone had roughly 250,000 refugees in their country, maybe you'll deny that too?

http://www.emz-berlin.de/projekte_e/pj2/pj2_1.htm (From 1999 alone)

Ethnic group Number per cent

Bosnia 27881 70
Croatia 5974 15
Serbia 1991 5
Other (esp. Roma) 3983 10
Total 39829 100

There is a significant difference between intentionally murdering thousands, forced evicions, targeting civilians all in the deliberate attempt to destroy a group of people. Such activity is usually refered to as genocide. Do you know who else had ambitions to create "Lebensraum" for his people? Serbia planned and deliberately wanted to push people from their homeland to expand their national territory. You're no different than the German today complaining that they were bombed in WWII.

People sitting out the war - invited and given plane rides to Germany and Austria - and arriving with no scratches, injuries, signs of torture or malnourishment at all.

Many had to leave simply because the war created chaos and economic devastation - only some - the politically correct - were given most help and opportunity to sit out the war and receive housing, aid, schooling, jobs.

The ones who had to stay and endure the wars or lived in refugee camps for years (the Serbs) had it the worst.

Serbs had 250,000 refugees driven from Croatia in just 3 days. (They had hundreds of thousands more driven from their homes in Bosnia during the war - but they were ALLOWED to come to Germany in those numbers.) They didn't have time to pack their bags, get on an airplane and being given apartments and homes and all sorts of help from host countries.

This report from 2005, Red, says that Serbia had the largest number of refugees in Europe. It also states that 10 years before (1995) they had 500,000 (half million). That WAY eclipses your relatively small 28,000 figure for Bosnian Muslims in Germany.

Serbia-Montenegro remains European country with largest number of refugees

Serbia-Montenegro has remained the European country with the most refugees, the UN refugee agency said Monday.

Although the number of refugees has diminished dramatically, the issue of refugees remains a major problem in Serbia-Montenegro, the Belgrade office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) said in a statement to mark World Refugee Day, which falls on Monday.

Ten years ago, there were half a million refugees in Serbia- Montenegro, and currently the population of registered refugees is near 150,000, the statement said.

It said the Sarajevo declaration should be honored. According to the declaration, Serbia-Montenegro, Croatia and Bosnia- Herzegovina should resolve the problem of refugees in their respective countries by the end of 2006.

Serbian Commissioner for Refugees Dragisa Dabetic has said that Serbia would try to resolve the problem of refugees mostly through the process of their integration into the local environment or their returning to their homes in Croatia or Bosnia-Herzegovina.

>>>>>>> There is a significant difference between intentionally murdering thousands, forced evicions, targeting civilians all in the deliberate attempt to destroy a group of people. Such activity is usually refered to as genocide. Do you know who else had ambitions to create "Lebensraum" for his people? Serbia planned and deliberately wanted to push people from their homeland to expand their national territory. You're no different than the German today complaining that they were bombed in WWII.<<<<

Serbia wanted to extend lebensraum? WTH you are talking about? .

If you compare ethnic makeup of Yugoslavia 1941 (prior Hitler), 1945(after), 1991(prior breakup) and today, it is evident that the Serbs were pushed out from their homeland in Croatia, Bosnia and occupied Serbian province of Kosovo.

Your comparrison of Serbs with Nazis is the real problem of your posts - Nazi revisionism.

One more thing. During WWII, USAAF bombed Germany but suffered horrible casualty of 50%. It was not free turkey shooting of civilians. It was accepted cost of waging war.

In 1999, 19 NATO countries gang raped Serbia and murdered her citizens (not only Serbs) without any real riskto flight crews. NATO was not waging war, it was "humanitarian intervention"

Unlike allied command in WWII, NATO did not admit that citizens of Serbian cities are the prinicipal target although they were, as numbers show (5000+ killed and maimed civilians, 1000 killed and maimed soldiers, 14 tanks destroyed.)

As I said before, you attempt to falsify history and equate Serbs with Nazis.

From Red6

"You're no different than the German today complaining that they were bombed in WWII"

Why this belitting of the crimes of the NAZIs in WW2?

The entire total of deaths in the Bosnian civil war was 100,000. From all sides, both civilian and military. This was a 4 way civil war.

Muslim against Croat
Croat against Serb
Serb against Muslim
Secular Muslim ( Abdic ) against Islamist( Izebegovic )

Yet you compare the crimes of the Bosnian Serbs with the NAZIs?

I wonder.

Is this belittling the crimes of the NAZIs by accident or design. I say this because your hero, Izetbegovic, was a WW2 war criminal, his "Muslim Youth" ( Young Muslim )movement was based on the Fascistic Muslim Brotherhood and provided the canon fodder for the Handzar Division. Many of his lifelong political colleagues actually donned the SS uniform AND he named his Praetorian Guard , "Handzar", in honour of same said SS Division.

Is that why you whitewash the crimes of the NAZIs?