Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Marijuana Top U.S. Cash Crop at $35 Billion
NewsMax ^ | Dec. 18, 2006 | Reuters

Posted on 12/18/2006 2:00:49 PM PST by kddid

U.S. growers produce nearly $35 billion worth of marijuana annually, making the illegal drug the country's largest cash crop, bigger than corn and wheat combined, an advocate of medical marijuana use said in a study released on Monday.

The report, conducted by Jon Gettman, a public policy analyst and former head of the National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws, also concluded that five U.S. states produce more than $1 billion worth of marijuana apiece: California, Tennessee, Kentucky, Hawaii and Washington.

California's production alone was about $13.8 billion, according to Gettman, who waged an unsuccessful six-year legal battle to force the government to remove marijuana from a list of drugs deemed to have no medical value.

Tom Riley, a spokesman for the U.S. Office of National Drug Control Policy, said he could not confirm the report's conclusions on the size of the country's marijuana crop. But he said the government estimated overall U.S. illegal drug use at $200 billion annually.

Gettman's figures were based on several government reports between 2002 and 2005 estimating the United States produced more than 10,000 metric tons of marijuana annually.

He calculated the producer price per pound of marijuana at $1,606 based on national survey data showing retail prices of between $2,400 and $3,000 between 2001 and 2005.

The total value of 10,000 metric tons of marijuana at $1,606 per pound would be $35.8 billion.

By comparison, the United States produced an average of nearly $23.3 billion worth of corn annually from 2003 to 2005, $17.6 billion worth of soybeans, $12.2 billion worth of hay, nearly $11.1 billion worth of vegetables and $7.4 billion worth of wheat, the report said.

Gettman said the 10-fold increase in U.S. marijuana production, from 1,000 metric tons in 1981 to 10,000 metric tons in 2006, showed the country was failing to control marijuana by making its cultivation and use illegal.

"Marijuana has become a pervasive and ineradicable part of the economy of the United States," he said. "The contribution of this market to the nation's gross domestic product is overlooked in the debate over effective control."

"Like all profitable agricultural crops marijuana adds resources and value to the economy," he added. "The focus of public policy should be how to effectively control this market through regulation and taxation in order to achieve immediate and realistic goals, such as reducing teenage access."

Riley said illegal drug use was a "serious part of the economy," but he rejected the notion of an economic argument for legalizing marijuana. He said marijuana use was an "inherently harmful activity" with serious physical and mental health consequences. He said more American teens were in treatment centers for marijuana dependency than for all other drugs combined.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: druggies; mrleroybait; potheadproblem; problem; stoners; stupiddopesmokers; wedeservewhatweget; wodlist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 181-189 next last
To: TheBattman

The 35 billion number is made up to see it keeps it equal.


61 posted on 12/18/2006 3:44:00 PM PST by Shanty Shaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: kddid

Something the gun-banner nitwits don't understand. Smuggled and underground-manufactured guns will become a lucrative "cash crop". You ain't seen gun violence in this country until you ban them.


62 posted on 12/18/2006 3:47:26 PM PST by FlyVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kddid

Budd bump


63 posted on 12/18/2006 3:48:30 PM PST by ßuddaßudd (7 days - 7 ways Guero » with a floating, shifting, ever changing persona....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheBattman

"$100 Billion in tax revenue on $35 Billion dollar industry???? Some interesting math, there."

See Post 21. I underestimated. Revenues would be much higher.


64 posted on 12/18/2006 3:51:17 PM PST by MeanWestTexan (Kol Hakavod Lezahal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: MeanWestTexan
"Then the cutting of law enforcement/prison/courts ..."

If marijuana was legal, we would not fire one cop, close one prison, or shut down one courtroom.

First, marijuana represents only 15% of all illegal drugs.

Second, 30% of current marijuana smokers are underage -- legalize it and I'd bet that percentage would climb to 50%. With half the smokers being underage, we'd still have a need for all the above.

Third, overall use would double, if not triple. This would result in an increase of accidents, treatment centers, hospital admissions, etc.

Oh, and good luck trying to collect that $190 billion in taxes.

65 posted on 12/18/2006 3:52:57 PM PST by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: DumpsterDiver
Ring-ring.

"Hello mister Diver, this is Agent Elefont with the USDA. We have been granted a bunch of your tax dollars to conduct an important agricultural survey. How much do you pay for weed? How much does it cost you to grow your own? When you sell your home grown weed, how much do you charge? Thank you very much for your time and honest answers. Our friends from the DEA and ATF are at your door now. Don't worry about opening it for them, they practice home invasions every day. Have a nice day!"
66 posted on 12/18/2006 3:55:31 PM PST by ARealMothersSonForever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: ichabod1

Heh, I had a friend whose parents sent him to rehab for pot. When he got out, we had all sorts of new sources for stuff. One of them was black-market cigarettes, even.


67 posted on 12/18/2006 3:59:21 PM PST by L98Fiero (The media is a self-licking ice-cream cone)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: kddid

Solution that no one would go for:

Legalize growing pot for one's own use. No need for any fake "medical" reason.

Illegal to sell it.

Price plummets.

Anyone caught selling it (why would anyone buy? They can grow it in their living room or backyard) would get publicanly caned.

Voila! Problem solved. Anyone who wants to smoke and get stupid(er) can do so.

And, no one under age (same age as drinking) can smoke it or more public caning.

The world would be a better place.


68 posted on 12/18/2006 4:02:46 PM PST by little jeremiah (C.S. says I'm a scarey little control freak!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: robertpaulsen

"Third, overall use would double, if not triple. This would result in an increase of accidents, treatment centers, hospital admissions, etc."

I seriously doubt that. Now if you were talking about a 16-year-old driving age, you are dead on. That's already legal, though.


69 posted on 12/18/2006 4:17:58 PM PST by L98Fiero (The media is a self-licking ice-cream cone)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: ARealMothersSonForever
Ring-ring

"Hello mister Diver, this is Agent Elefont with the USDA. [...] Our friends from the DEA and ATF are at your door now. Don't worry about opening it for them, they practice home invasions every day."

"Good morning. You have reached the corporate offices of Escobar & Amigos Pharmaceuticals. Please press 1 for English."

"Click!"

70 posted on 12/18/2006 4:46:13 PM PST by DumpsterDiver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: razorback-bert

Dave?


71 posted on 12/18/2006 7:13:16 PM PST by hodaka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: kddid; Abram; albertp; AlexandriaDuke; Alexander Rubin; Allosaurs_r_us; Americanwolf; ...
WOD utter failure alert...





Libertarian ping! To be added or removed from my ping list freepmail me or post a message here.
72 posted on 12/18/2006 10:22:00 PM PST by traviskicks (http://www.neoperspectives.com/optimism_nov8th.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RockinRight

"COULD NOT STOP smoking weed?"


My guess.....they didn't want to or had no incentive to do so. Once you're out in the job market, life gets a little tougher. (drug test, financial responsibility, etc.) I have friends who have smoked their entire adult life on the edge of society's restrictions.


73 posted on 12/19/2006 4:03:47 AM PST by wolfcreek (Please Lord, May I be, one who sees what's in front of me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah
"Solution that no one would go for:
Legalize growing pot for one's own use. No need for any fake "medical" reason.
Illegal to sell it.
Price plummets.
Anyone caught selling it (why would anyone buy? They can grow it in their living room or backyard) would get publicanly caned."

Nice theory, but in practice it doesn't work.

Proposition 215 (legalizing medical marijuana) passed 10 years ago in California. It made it legal to grow your own. It made it illegal to sell it.

The price did not plummet. As a matter of fact, "legal" medical marijuana is more expensive than illegal marijuana. It's sold in stores in clear violation of California law.

And no one has been punished, much less caned.

74 posted on 12/19/2006 4:58:33 AM PST by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: L98Fiero

"He said more American teens were in treatment centers for marijuana dependency than for all other drugs combined."

BS statement.


75 posted on 12/19/2006 5:03:58 AM PST by caver (Yes, I did crawl out of a hole in the ground.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: L98Fiero
"I seriously doubt that."

In the late 70's, marijuana use was triple its lowest point. And it was illegal. Between then and now, the only thing that changed was tougher enforcement and an attitude change by the public.

Legalize marijuana and those deterrents go away. Marijuana use could easily go back to 1979 levels. On what basis do you "seriously doubt" that?

76 posted on 12/19/2006 5:09:28 AM PST by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: caver
"BS statement."

Care to elaborate?

77 posted on 12/19/2006 5:13:11 AM PST by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: Risha

"What's a dime bag going for these days?"

A dime! Just a lot smaller.


78 posted on 12/19/2006 5:16:16 AM PST by wolfcreek (Please Lord, May I be, one who sees what's in front of me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: robertpaulsen

"On what basis do you "seriously doubt" that?"

"an attitude change by the public."

Bingo. Just like cigarettes.


79 posted on 12/19/2006 5:16:30 AM PST by L98Fiero (The media is a self-licking ice-cream cone)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Tolsti
What a peculiar reaction. Care to elucidate?

Carolyn

80 posted on 12/19/2006 5:19:34 AM PST by CDHart ("It's too late to work within the system and too early to shoot the b@#$%^&s."--Claire Wolfe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 181-189 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson