Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Coals Of Fire (Coal Fires Worse Than Autos and Trucks)
Investor's Business Daily ^ | 19 December 2006 | Staff

Posted on 12/19/2006 3:08:26 PM PST by shrinkermd

Environment: If we scrap all the cars, SUVs, minivans and pickup trucks in America, greenhouse gas emissions could be cut by maybe 2%. What if we could realize a similar reduction without the economic impact?

So why not try to extinguish the fires that continue to burn unchecked at dozens of coal deposits around the world? This, it is estimated, could cut global emissions of carbon dioxide from the burning of fossil fuel by 2% to 3%.

...Coal fires can occur in natural settings or in or near abandoned and active mines. They can be ignited by lightning strikes, spontaneous combustion, even sunlight. But they’re mostly a man-made problem and have been around as long as man himself. Left alone, they “can burn for hundreds or even thousand of years,” according to Environmental Health Perspectives.

...They are particularly messy in China, where “about 120 million tons of coal are consumed in uncontrolled fires each year,” said Andries Rosema, director of Environmental Analysis and Remote Sensing Co. In addition to emitting CO2 — which is not a pollutant — coal fires throw off noxious gases, sulfur and soot.

...If coal fires produced some economic benefit, there might be a reasonable trade-off to letting them burn. But they create neither jobs nor wealth, let alone energy.

(Excerpt) Read more at epaper.investors.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS: cars; coalfires; pollution
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last
2% for Autos and Trucks?
1 posted on 12/19/2006 3:08:30 PM PST by shrinkermd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd

the little bit going on right now at Mount St Helens is worse than all the cars and trucks in this country put together


2 posted on 12/19/2006 3:12:16 PM PST by sure_fine (*not one to over kill the thought process*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd
they create neither jobs nor wealth, let alone energy.

This statement makes little sense by itself or in the context of the article. Coal has done and still does these things.

3 posted on 12/19/2006 3:15:11 PM PST by RightWhale (RTRA DLQS GSCW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd
So why not try to extinguish the fires that continue to burn unchecked at dozens of coal deposits around the world?

Because extinguishing the coal fires would not harm the US economy.
Environmentalism is not about the environment.

4 posted on 12/19/2006 3:17:55 PM PST by magslinger (An open mind is like an outhouse. Sooner or later someone is going to fill it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd

Believe it or not, even The New York Times had an article about how
gawd-awful the pollution is from the unextinguished coal fires in China.

The general factoid I recall from that article is it's a much worse
source of pollution that all the cars/trucks in North America.


5 posted on 12/19/2006 3:20:19 PM PST by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: magslinger

Correctamundo.


6 posted on 12/19/2006 3:22:50 PM PST by Mr. Lucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: VOA
The general factoid I recall from that article is it's a much worse source of pollution that all the cars/trucks in North America.

In terms of smog forming and poisonous pollutants, it's no contest. Uncontrolled Chinese coal mine fires produce thousands of times more smog forming pollutants than all the cars in the United States.

But even in terms of CO2, which is an unavoidable product of gasoline production that is not eliminated by modern emissions controls, those Chinese coal mine fires emit at least as much as every US car east of the Mississippi River.

7 posted on 12/19/2006 3:34:00 PM PST by gridlock (We just got dumped. McCain and Rudy are Rebound Guys. Let's not marry the Rebound Guy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: gridlock

I've been posting this factoid on this board, at various times, for years.


8 posted on 12/19/2006 3:34:35 PM PST by gridlock (We just got dumped. McCain and Rudy are Rebound Guys. Let's not marry the Rebound Guy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd

I must have been REALLY bad this year . Santa left me three tons of coal behind the fence .


9 posted on 12/19/2006 3:39:13 PM PST by Renegade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sure_fine
the little bit going on right now at Mount St Helens is worse than all the cars and trucks in this country put together

Sorry. completely false (If you're talking about CO2). Human activities produce 150 times the amount of CO2 per year on average as every volcano on earth combined.

Just because you want to believe something (that you don't bother to research) doesn't mean it's true.

10 posted on 12/19/2006 3:48:35 PM PST by Strategerist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Renegade
SO, what are you waiting for? Mark it up and sell it, f'Heaven's sake!

;^)

11 posted on 12/19/2006 3:56:20 PM PST by SAJ (debunking myths about markets and prices on FR since 2001)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Strategerist

..and your source for this claim is ??


12 posted on 12/19/2006 3:57:06 PM PST by SAJ (debunking myths about markets and prices on FR since 2001)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Renegade

You must be expecting a cold winter. Thats a sign!


13 posted on 12/19/2006 4:08:49 PM PST by crz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd

Forest fire is 2nd behind volcanos.

If the fire happens at the boreal forest (which is at the tree line north) the fire burns not only the trees but the perma frost which is extremely high in Carbon. Then, after the fire is out, the sun thaws that portion of that peat yearly re-releasing carbon for years to come untill the forest grows back to shade those areas. Many times, an area about the size of WI burns unchecked up in Canada. Peat, burns not unlike coal and continues to burn till weather puts it out.


14 posted on 12/19/2006 4:15:04 PM PST by crz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SAJ

Oh this should be good.

I cant wait for the source.


15 posted on 12/19/2006 4:17:05 PM PST by crz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd
If we scrap all the cars, SUVs, minivans and pickup trucks in America, greenhouse gas emissions could be cut by maybe 2%.

Oh good - a leap of faith in the first sentance. The concept of "greenhouse gas" emissions is very, very debatable. I guess that the greenies are tired of beating up the auto industry and have decided to go after power companies instead.

16 posted on 12/19/2006 4:20:52 PM PST by meyer (Bring back the Contract with America and you'll bring back the Republican majority.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gridlock

There are coal outcrops in Gillette, WY that have burned hundreds of feet into the hillside ages ago. These are uncovered in the mining sequence. Ditto eastern coals in KY/W VA.


17 posted on 12/19/2006 4:30:17 PM PST by Eric in the Ozarks (BTUs are my Beat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd

Coal fires are neat. They give off a nice blue light at night, and the grass grows green all year around them.

Besides, it's just old compacted dinosaurs and ferns that should have been cremated 70,000,000 years ago.


18 posted on 12/19/2006 5:37:05 PM PST by oldbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd

The Springfield tire fire is still going strong.


19 posted on 12/19/2006 7:47:03 PM PST by Rodney King (No, we can't all just get along.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale

The point was the coal fires, inintended and uncontrolled fires, do no benefit. The point was not that coal usage is without merit.


20 posted on 12/19/2006 7:53:44 PM PST by Fierce Allegiance (Merry Christmas! SAY NO TO RUDY!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson