Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CharlesWayneCT
I can say that Mary Chaney was selfish in forcing a child to be brought into the world without a loving biological family unit.

I have to agree with this. She can be a loving mother, but getting pregnant by either someone or by a test tube simply for the sake of avoiding having a father in the child's life is pure selfishness. Children need a mother figure and they need a father figure. Heterosexual couples that adopt are loving parents that are providing mother-father influences. Bisexual couples that have children in the way Mary is having one are depriving that child of the father influence. I see all the time what happens to young women and young men that have not had this influence and it is not good.
322 posted on 12/20/2006 9:10:14 AM PST by Eagle of Liberty ("I do a lot of things to irritate the libs. And it works!" - Rush Limbaugh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 305 | View Replies ]


To: Kerretarded

Tying another thread into this one, for years women married men they didn't love and had sex they didn't want simply so they could have a child.

Why should today's lesbians have it any different?


331 posted on 12/20/2006 9:43:31 AM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 322 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson