....he probably wouldn't even know what one was....and when told, he would have had them arrested and shot as violators of the laws of God and man.
Mr. Meyerson,
I have to thank you for the chuckle you so kindly granted me this morning as I read your utterly absurd op-ed regarding the split in the Episcopal church.
If you for one second believe that the Anglicans in President Washington's time would have tolerated the non-sense of a man seeking to marry another man in a religion that strictly forbids it, you're a bigger fool than even this piece would hint at.
Equality? Toss! This has to do with the true nature of family, the divine blessing of such, and the nature of sin--something you apparently have problems even acknowleging.
Oh, that's right! Equality before the Word of God! What was I thinking?!
Thanks for setting us all straight. So when can we expect your criticism of Aquinas to come out?
Exactly. He would probably have called it something like "the unnatural abomination" or "practioners of the sin of Sodom."