Replies

Though I suppose it's none of my business, those are the kinds I'd hate to see. And perhaps the price of public displays. As I've occasionally noted, personally, I'm fine with observance, including displays, at home, or at Synagogue or Church, or on private property. Avoids the appearance of a Holiday Arguement Season. But it's not up to me, and they should be allowed in the public square. All of them, which includes the Crescent and the KKK when they can convince a judge they're a religion.

80 posted on 12/20/2006 5:57:13 PM PST by SJackson (had to move the national debate from whether to stay the course to how do we start down the path out)

"Though I suppose it's none of my business, those are the kinds I'd hate to see. And perhaps the price of public displays. As I've occasionally noted, personally, I'm fine with observance, including displays, at home, or at Synagogue or Church, or on private property. Avoids the appearance of a Holiday Arguement Season. But it's not up to me, and they should be allowed in the public square. All of them, which includes the Crescent and the KKK when they can convince a judge they're a religion."

I agree! And yes, I do use a bit of a sardonic sense of humor to ridicule public attempts from people (who are otherwise very secular) to rouse occasionally religious mobs against others. Such "opinion" journalists do so mostly for their sponsors, IMO!

87 posted on 12/20/2006 6:07:15 PM PST by familyop ("G-d is on our side because he hates the Yanks." --St. Tuco, in the "Good, the Bad, and the Ugly")

"All of them, which includes the Crescent and the KKK when they can convince a judge they're a religion."

Their offspring could display burning crescents! What a festive addition to the holidays that would be!

94 posted on 12/20/2006 6:16:12 PM PST by familyop ("G-d is on our side because he hates the Yanks." --St. Tuco, in the "Good, the Bad, and the Ugly")