Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Congress Goes Kosher: CAGW Cheers Pork-Free Diet
CAGW Website ^ | 12 Dec 2006 | Alexa Moutevelis

Posted on 12/22/2006, 11:39:57 PM by Small-L

Washington, D.C. Citizens Against Government Waste (CAGW) today applauded a decision by incoming House and Senate Appropriations Committee Chairmen David Obey (D-Wis.) and Robert Byrd (D-W. Va.) to pass a continuing resolution (CR) for the remainder of fiscal 2007. The CR will keep most agencies running at fiscal 2006 funding levels and will stave off the estimated 10,000 earmarks costing approximately $17 billion in the nine unfinished appropriations bills. The duo also announced a “moratorium” on earmarks until budget reforms are passed.

“Today’s announcement is a huge victory for taxpayers,” CAGW President Tom Schatz said. “A CR pre-empts funding increases for bloated federal agencies and thousands of pork-barrel projects. However, Congress must pass earmark reforms during its ‘pork diet’ or it will gain back the weight it loses.’”

The 109th Congress passed only the Defense and Homeland Security Appropriations bills for fiscal 2007. Sens. Tom Coburn (R-Okla.), Jim DeMint (R-S.C.), and Jeff Sessions (R-Ala.) were instrumental in blocking an omnibus package containing the remaining appropriations bills. A continuing resolution is in effect until February 15, 2007. Today’s announcement means the Democratic-led 110th Congress will opt to extend the CR until the end of the year instead of belatedly passing the remaining appropriations bills.

“Together with the promise to forgo next year’s congressional pay raise, Democrats are taking important steps toward changing business-as-usual in Washington,” Schatz continued.

Many of the projects left out of the budget for fiscal 2007 will likely be considered under the new budget rules for fiscal 2008; Democratic leadership has promised to make budget reform a top priority. Earmark reforms favored by CAGW include: Requiring disclosure of earmark sponsors and recipients; limiting the number of earmarks each member can request; prohibiting earmarks that have not been the subject of a congressional hearing; prohibiting earmarks from being “airdropped” into bills during conference negotiations; and making conference reports available 48 hours prior to floor consideration. These proposals are discussed in greater detail in CAGW’s report, All About Pork: The Abuse of Earmarks and the Needed Reforms. Pork-barrel spending has grown from 546 projects costing $3.1 billion in fiscal 1991 to 9,963 projects costing $29 billion in fiscal 2006, as documented CAGW’s annual Congressional Pig Book.

“An interesting test will be to see how the country endures under a CR. If the sky does not fall, if flat budgets make no difference in the lives of everyday citizens, it explodes the myth that congressional pork and spending increases are truly necessary,” Schatz concluded.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Extended News; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: cagw; earmarks; pork
Citizens Against Government Waste is a nonpartisan, nonprofit organization dedicated to eliminating waste, fraud, mismanagement and abuse in government. I.e. don't blame them for applauding the opposition--our wonderful "compassionate conservatives" in Congress left the door wide open, and the D'rats accepted the opportunity to be more rational and conservative than the Republicans have been.
1 posted on 12/22/2006, 11:39:59 PM by Small-L
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Small-L
"D'rats accepted the opportunity to be more rational and conservative than the Republicans have been"

The fact that doing so is not terribly hard for even sociopathic Marxists says a bit about this last congress.
2 posted on 12/22/2006, 11:44:19 PM by RedStateRocker (Nuke Mecca, Deport all illegals, abolish the IRS, ATF and DEA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Small-L
"Democratic leadership has promised to make budget reform "

Two reforms will be implemented as quickly as possibe: 1) Increase Taxes and 2) Increase handouts to special interests

3 posted on 12/22/2006, 11:45:22 PM by traditional1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Small-L

The republicans did a horrendously pathetic job managing the budget.


4 posted on 12/22/2006, 11:47:55 PM by mgstarr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Small-L
CAGW Cheers Pork-Free Diet

"CAIR Cheers Pork-Free Diet"

Two little letters, a world of difference in meaning.
5 posted on 12/22/2006, 11:48:37 PM by Old_Mil (http://www.constitutionparty.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: traditional1

Then perhaps this President will learn to use his veto pen - if he can find it....


6 posted on 12/22/2006, 11:49:20 PM by mgstarr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: mgstarr
The two weapons left for 2007-2008:

Filibuster

Veto Pen

7 posted on 12/23/2006, 12:08:01 AM by traditional1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Small-L

I smell Hitlary and Bill


8 posted on 12/23/2006, 12:11:59 AM by freekitty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Small-L

The Dimwits will tell us this and pretend to do while they are doing exactly the opposite.


9 posted on 12/23/2006, 12:12:46 AM by freekitty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Small-L

Byrd, thy name is PORK! I'll believe it when I see it.


10 posted on 12/23/2006, 12:36:39 AM by PzLdr ("The Emperor is not as forgiving as I am" - Darth Vader)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Small-L

$17 billion in pork savings? OK... But we have 60 Trillion in "automatic" exenditures - unfunded entitlement liabilities (SS, Medicare) to cut or contain. $17 billion is a very small drop in the bucket, even though I admire CAGW.


11 posted on 12/23/2006, 1:11:39 AM by 4Liberty (privatize don't subsidize!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 4Liberty
$17 billion is a very small drop in the bucket

The longest journey begins with a single step... I'll take whatever step I can get, no matter how small.

I find it amazingly ironic that the D'rats are getting credit for being the more fiscally responsible party by CAGW. The GOP did it to themselves (and us). It's not like some of us weren't screaming the warning at them, but were ignored because Bush and company viewed the conservatives in the party as "an ideology of universal selfishness."

12 posted on 12/23/2006, 1:34:18 AM by Small-L ("Government is not the answer to our problems -- government is the problem." --RWR)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson