To: LdSentinal
Jimmy Carter is a bigger anti-semite than Michael Irving.
Is it worse to deny the holocaust and to be an anti-semite or to not deny the holocaust and to be an anti-semite anyway? I would think that the former because the denial of the holocaust is driven by blind hate.
Notwithstanding, Jimmy Carter is definitely an anti-semite like many on the left.
15 posted on
12/23/2006 2:29:44 PM PST by
etradervic
(Merry Christmas)
To: etradervic
Which brings up another question. Why are so many Jews Registered and loyal Democrats, regularly voting for antisemitic, left wing despisers of Jews?
80 posted on
12/23/2006 3:55:28 PM PST by
F.J. Mitchell
( BP agents Ignacio Ramos and Jose Compean, Patriots betrayed and punished for their competence!!!!)
To: etradervic
Is it worse to deny the holocaust and to be an anti-semite or to not deny the holocaust and to be an anti-semite anyway?The worst are the non-denying antisemites. They are more deceptive and harder to spot. Holocaust denial instantly identifies one as a crackpot. The 'sweet reason' approach of hatefilled maggots like Jimmuh Cahtuh will fool the unwary.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson