Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why the French Government Banned Headscarves in Schools
Washington University in St. Louis ^ | Thu 21-Dec-200

Posted on 12/23/2006 6:32:10 PM PST by seastay

March 15th will mark the third anniversary of a law passed by the French government banning from public schools all clothing that indicates a student's religious affiliation. Though written in a religion-neutral way, most people in France, and around the world, knew the law was aimed at keeping Muslim girls from wearing headscarves to class.

But why? In March 2004, the French government enacted a law prohibiting all clothing that indicates a student's religious affiliation, including headscarves like the one above, in public schools. The perplexing move is the subject of a new book by John Bowen, Ph.D., the Dunbar-Van Cleve Professor in Arts & Sciences at Washington University in St. Louis.

John R. Bowen, Ph.D., the Dunbar-Van Cleve Professor of Sociocultural Anthropology in Arts & Sciences at Washington University in St. Louis, was in France at the time and has written an enlightening book, recently published by Princeton University Press, titled "Why the French Don't Like Headscarves: Islam, the State and Public Space."

In it, he attempts to explainthrough an examination of France's religious history, ideas about politics and society, and day-to-day media coverage and political events leading up to the law in 2003-04 why the French government made such a perplexing move.

"French public figures seemed to blame the headscarves for a surprising range of France's problems," writes Bowen in the book's introduction, "including anti-Semitism, Islamic fundamentalism, growing ghettoization in the poor suburbs, and the breakdown of order in the classroom. A vote against headscarves would, we heard, support women battling for freedom in Afghanistan, schoolteachers trying to teach history in Lyon, and all those who wished to reinforce the principles of liberty, equality and fraternity."

Bowen, an expert on religion, politics and Islam, was in France conducting research on what Muslims were doing to create their own schools and other institutions in the country.

He says that Muslims living in non-majority Muslim countries like France find it challenging to adapt their religious institutions and practices - such as the wearing of headscarves by Muslim women and girls - to secular laws and traditions.

From that research, he's working on another book, titled "Shaping Islam in France," to be published in 2008, which will examine how French Muslims strive to build a base for their religious lives in a society that views these practices as incompatible with national values.

But as the debate over headscarves heated up, he became interested in that subject and began to follow it closely.

"It's an odd enough thing to do, to ban headscarves," he says. "It led to so much international perplexity or anger that is was worth writing about. Also, it tapped into something deep about France and about people who don't fit into the French cultural mode."

Bird's eye view

Living in France provided Bowen an unusual opportunity to see first-hand how the passage of the headscarves ban unfolded. Bowen sat through debates on the topic at the National Assembly, he analyzednewspapers and television programs and he talked to many officials and intellectuals involved in these issues, both Muslims and non-Muslims.

In the book, Bowen examines the long-term nature of how the state relates to religion in France. He looks at the relationship of external events in the Islamic world and French concerns about Islam, starting in the 1980s. He then examines the 10-month period preceding the law banning headscarves to explain in a much more day-to-day way how public opinion was turned against headscarves and how political pressure to "do something" took over the country.

"France has a long-standing tradition of state control and support of religious activity despite its modern laws concerning secularity," says Bowen. "We often have the misconception that the state stays out of religious affairs. In fact, the French government pays the salaries of all teachers in private religious schools, it organized a national Islamic body, and it and city governments put a lot of money into building churches and mosques.

"But because the Republican political tradition that developed out of the French Revolution of 1789 targeted the privileges of the Catholic Church, many French citizens developed a certain allergy to religions' symbolism in public, and particularly in schools, a battleground between the Church and the Republic," continues Bowen.

"French people see schools as a place where children should leave their particular religious, ethnic or regional loyalties behind and just enter into French life. It's different from our notion of local control."

Rising tension

France has been involved in a tense relationship with the Islamic world since the late 1980s, says Bowen. Algeria, which is now a Muslim state, was part of France until it became independent in 1962.

In the 1980s, with the rise of the political Islam of Salman Rushdie and the Ayatollah Khomeini, many younger French people began claiming the right to be Muslim in public with beards and headscarves.

Also around that time, there began to be bombings in France by people associated with an Islamic military movement in Algeria.

"French people started to link what they saw as dangerous or violent Islam elsewhere in the world with what they saw happening in France," says Bowen. "Every time there was a rise in concern about that, there was a rise in pressure to keep headscarves out of schools. When fear of Islam in the world died down, then that pressure receded as well."

However, in the spring of 2003, France's Interior MinisterNicolas Sarkozy, a front-runner to be hiscountry's next president, made a famous speech denouncing Muslims who did not follow a French law requiring the removal of head coverings for identity photos. He drew a link between Muslim women wearing a headscarf and the failure of Muslims to embrace the Republic.

According to Bowen, the speech fueled a political and media bandwagon; eventually public opinion turned from not wanting to ban headscarves in schools because it seemed trivial to being massively in favor of the law.

The law was passed on March 15, 2004, and first went into effect in September 2004.

"People were prepared for a lot of tension and many girls said they were going to try to wear the scarves anyway," Bowen says. "Then there were some French reporters taken hostage by an armed Islamic group in Iraq that demanded that France rescind the law. Although the two journalists were eventually freed, the fact that they were taken hostage made it disloyal in the court of public opinion to be against the law and many opponents backed off. That was it. There have been very few incidents and things quieted down very quickly."

In fact, the major effect of the law's passage has been to build support for a private school sector that is under development for Muslims in France, Bowen says.

"Muslim public leaders have been creating schools, institutes of higher learning and other training centers to improve Muslims' futures," he says. Bowen has been following one school, which is likely to be the first to receive state funding. There, teachers follow the national curriculum, but they and the students can wear headscarves and pray together on Fridays, just as Catholics follow Catholic worship in their own schools.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Head scarfs are degrading to womans rights, so it is a good thing that the French have banned them. The new ban against head scarfs empowers woman to have freedom to say no.

Headscarf's however should not be considered religious, becuase they are cultural in tradition, belonging predominately to a culture who just happens to worship Mohammad, yet a cultural hindrance to the freedom and rights of woman worldwide. But describing the law as being a fair ban on all religious relics in public is a mistake because, the separation of church and state works best when it allows the the state to grant freedom of religion, and not freedom to own the right from viewing others peoples religion.

1 posted on 12/23/2006 6:32:11 PM PST by seastay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: seastay
It's an odd enough thing to do, to ban headscarves," he says

No it's not an odd thing to do - it's the smart thing to do and the French are sticking to their guns on this issue.

2 posted on 12/23/2006 6:35:45 PM PST by x_plus_one
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: seastay
In fact, the major effect of the law's passage has been to build support for a private school sector that is under development for Muslims in France, Bowen says.

The law of unintended consequences. This will lead to further segregation.

3 posted on 12/23/2006 6:38:06 PM PST by AmishDude (It doesn't matter whom you vote for. It matters who takes office.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: seastay
March 15th will mark the third anniversary of a law passed by the French government banning from public schools all clothing that indicates a student's religious affiliation.

So it is all right if non-Muslim girls wear headscarves?

Just checking

Sounds as insane as that US school that banned pink/black clothing because they thought they were "gang-oolours"

4 posted on 12/23/2006 6:41:06 PM PST by Oztrich Boy (South Park Liberal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: seastay

The fact that there are so many different head coverings proves it is not religious but local custom. This is a religion that governs every single thing, the fact that there is no one covering tells you all you need to know.


5 posted on 12/23/2006 6:50:32 PM PST by McGavin999 (Don't bring what you ran away from to my home state-Freeper WatchingInAmazement)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oztrich Boy

The French have banned headscarves in school for the same reason that the Turks have banned headscarves in schools.


6 posted on 12/23/2006 6:51:20 PM PST by SubMareener (Become a monthly donor! Free FreeRepublic.com from Quarterly FReepathons!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: seastay
They need to wear the proper kind of headscarf:


7 posted on 12/23/2006 7:28:35 PM PST by Albion Wilde (...where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is freedom. -2 Cor 3:17)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oztrich Boy; McGavin999; AmishDude; seastay

This is exactly what needs to be done in Iraq. Muslims are so simplistically religious they are easily controlled. You ban the veil, you kill the dissenters, and then you have a secular society that can be tamed. Tunesia bans the veil, and tourism is booming. Iran kills secular clerics, and plunges further into economic disaster. It is that simple.


8 posted on 12/23/2006 7:28:35 PM PST by bukkdems (If this global warming gets out of hand, we can use some of that nuclear winter.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: bukkdems

However, I understand when sand is blowing relentlessly, a scarf covering the hair and ears is essential for men and women.


9 posted on 12/23/2006 7:30:59 PM PST by bukkdems (If this global warming gets out of hand, we can use some of that nuclear winter.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: x_plus_one
Many U.S. schools ban wearing caps in school.
10 posted on 12/23/2006 7:55:08 PM PST by BW2221
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: bukkdems
Lots of deserts in France. (sarc.)
11 posted on 12/23/2006 7:58:17 PM PST by BW2221
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: seastay
Head scarves are not denegrating to women's rights. Mandatory wearing is denegrating as is prohibition. Rights mean you would have the right to wear it or not.

School kids often are told what they can and cannot wear. If they allow head coverings, hats etc., they should allow scarves.

The French should be more concerned about a moslem population explosion and young arabs setting fire to cars and attacking police officers.

12 posted on 12/23/2006 8:04:21 PM PST by carolinalivin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: seastay
The picture of an oppressed woman.


13 posted on 12/23/2006 8:07:48 PM PST by Tamar1973 (Making every thread a Star Wars thread, one post at a time!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: carolinalivin

"Rights mean you would have the right to wear it or not."

That's the whole point, how many of these woman, young girls choose to wear it for themselves, what would happen in their own families if they did not wish to?


14 posted on 12/23/2006 8:13:29 PM PST by seastay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: seastay

So you're saying if the girl is forced to wear them then the government prohibiting them is protecting their rights. George Orwell, call for George Orwell.


15 posted on 12/23/2006 8:19:27 PM PST by carolinalivin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: seastay
Bowen has been following one school, which is likely to be the first to receive state funding.

Be careful that they don't segregate all into their own schools, preaching their own message, at the multicultural expense of the taxpayers.

In the French case at least some of their public school indoctrination is probably a good thing. Better these kids turn out French than Jihadists! They shouldn't stop at the scarves. PE classes in standard US school attire, where they can be seen by the opposite sex in shorts and t-shirts, is important to desensitize the potential rapists to displays of knees and elbows and to empower wannabee feminists. If Daddy doesn't like it he can take her back to wherever and give up all those welfare euros. Requiring them all to shower after PE is alas too much to expect; this is France afterall.

16 posted on 12/23/2006 8:40:30 PM PST by JohnBovenmyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: seastay
John R. Bowen, Ph.D., the Dunbar-Van Cleve Professor of Sociocultural Anthropology in Arts & Sciences at Washington University in St. Louis

Oh my! Does that come with a uniform and fruit salad?

The French need to ban Muslim immigration, not head scarves. Banning head scarves is just a way of continuing the fiction that a France where the French are a minority will still be France.

17 posted on 12/23/2006 9:02:00 PM PST by jordan8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: seastay

At first the extremists will whine and butcher, then they will pick up and move back to their hideous hellhole countries. This is why strict cultural laws even just on religious headdress would be so effective.


18 posted on 12/24/2006 3:07:07 AM PST by tkathy (Sectarian violence? Or genocidal racists? Which is a better description of islamists?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: carolinalivin
"call for George Orwell."

You have a point, and this is an interesting topic.

Now it is true we don’t want anybody, most specifically a government telling us what we can or cannot wear, or who we can talk too, or who has the right to monitor who. But in certain instances, such as a time of war, as this culture war which is being waged, where woman have the most to loose as victims, I think I have to side with the head scarf law temporally, until we achieve the culture victory of woman to be free of Sharia law.

Sharia law is the instrument by which Political Islam seeks to control the Muslim world. Sharia law is strongly patriarchal. Under Sharia, women must cover their bodies from head to foot and are forbidden from appearing in public without a headscarf, called a jilbab.



In places like Indonesia where this Orwellian Sharia law is in practice for women, the implementation has had a profound effect on their lives. In these places they can no longer go out at night without a male relative, and are subject to random checks by the Sharia police and can be detained for not wearing headscarf.

The west is engaged in a culture war against Sharia, to this end, ironically, some of our own rights might have to be curtailed temporally in order to win and secure our freedoms. Just like the patriot act, gives the government extraordinary powers that many people feel as overstepping its authority, so will many other of our freedoms need to be curtailed and secured by a strong government until we achieve victory, else we may as well give up now.

In this case, banning the use of the head scarf in public schools opposes the mandate by Sharia and helps secure the advances made by woman for their rights that is under now threat, and if anyone can say that Sharia isn’t degrading to woman worldwide, then I don’t know what else to say...
19 posted on 12/24/2006 9:57:35 AM PST by seastay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson