To: Mr. Brightside
To: martin_fierro
--yep--I wonder if the crack investigative group that "caught" Richard Jewell has attempted to determine the whereabouts of the alleged "dirty nuke" man at the time of the "OK bombing"-- (as it was at first referred to by said investigative group--)?
8 posted on
12/25/2006 6:17:01 AM PST by
rellimpank
(-don't believe anything the MSM states about firearms or explosives--NRA Benefactor)
To: martin_fierro
Does the dirty nuke man have a name?
12 posted on
12/25/2006 6:29:59 AM PST by
Fzob
(In matters of style, swim with the current; in matters of principle, stand like a rock. Jefferson)
To: martin_fierro
[The Congressional Report] cites several leads the subcommittee believes weren't fully investigated, including:
The FBI originally looked for another suspect it named John Doe 2, even providing a sketch, but abruptly dropped that line of inquiry. The subcommittee concludes that decision was a mistake.
Phone record and witness testimony that persons associated with Middle Eastern terrorism in the Philippines may have had contact with Nichols, and that Nichols took a book about explosives to the Philippines.
Information from a former TV reporter concerning an Iraqi national who was in Oklahoma around the time of the bombing.
What are the chances that this information is going to be pursued now, let alone see the light of day in the SOMA wing of the national media?
To: martin_fierro
Too bad that in these PC days....we are no supposed to torture Padilla to make him talk....bump
24 posted on
12/25/2006 7:16:04 AM PST by
B.O. Plenty
(liberalism, abortions and islam are terminal)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson