[Jaysun]

Thank you Skywalk, but you make the same mistake as the others. The question is this: what makes it rape? I say sexual intercourse. Others argue that this is just a legal definition. Okay, then WTF is their definition of rape?
It involves sex or it isn't rape. That isn't just a legal matter, but one of common sense. The same as homosexuality, it involves sex or it isn't homosexuality. What is so "warm and fuzzy" about that?
We've been inundated with liberal PC talk and some buy into it - I do not.

[hinckley buzzard]

It's fun swimming against the PC conventional wisdom, eh Jaysun? The fact is, you're right and the others are too. Rape is about the use of sex to achieve an aggressive aim which is the sexual subjugation of the victim. Sexualized aggression is the full term for acts like rape. The feminists distort it out of their own neurotic needs, and the PC brigade sucks it up without thinking it through. At the same time the feminazis will say that any sex no matter how 'consensual' is still really rape--you can't argue with that kind of stupid.

But it would also be inaccurate to say rape is purely sexual in motivation, because many rapists find themselves impotent in the commission of the act--which may infuriate them so much that these are the ones who kill their victims.

[Stentor]

We've been inundated with liberal PC talk and some buy into it - I do not.

The intent of the feminist re-definition of rape was as the setup to the "all men are rapists" charge. Under their construction then, rape was not a sex crime with the perverted component of real physical domination, but a political act in the gender war. You have exposed how successful their propoganda effort has been.