Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 12/27/2006 10:22:27 AM PST by SmithL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


So much for the will of the people.


2 posted on 12/27/2006 10:22:52 AM PST by SmithL (Where are we going? . . . . And why are we in this handbasket????)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL

Hahahaha...as if anyone had any doubt.


3 posted on 12/27/2006 10:23:36 AM PST by rhombus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL

They only force the legislature to act when it suits their agenda.


4 posted on 12/27/2006 10:27:21 AM PST by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL
The state's highest court ruled Wednesday it had no authority to force lawmakers...

BS! The MA Supreme Court had no problem 3 years ago telling the Legislature that it had six months to change state laws to make it happen. That wasn't forcing lawmakers?

7 posted on 12/27/2006 10:30:08 AM PST by LibFreeOrDie (L'Chaim!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL
"In light of the court's decision, it's going to be very difficult for legislators to violate their oath of office by sidestepping a vote," Romney spokesman Eric Fehrnstrom said.

Wrong. It's incredibly easy for the legislators in Massachusetts to do whatever the hell they want, whenever they feel like doing it. Why? Because they have almost no opposition, and even when nominally "opposed" (by some poor Republican stiff without party organization or real financial support), Bay State voters keep returning them to office.

The state legislature has routinely ignored voter-approved referenda and initiatives, and has only been rewarded for it by the voters, who seem to enjoy living in a one-party state governed by tax-fattened solons who put their entire extended families on the state payroll.

Sorry, Massachusetts: don't blame your corrupt state reps for taking you seriously when you return them to office with 80% pluralities year after year. They think you're all idiots and see no reason to change their opinions.    

8 posted on 12/27/2006 10:35:07 AM PST by andy58-in-nh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL
The state's highest court ruled Wednesday it had no authority to force lawmakers to vote on a proposed constitutional amendment to ban gay marriage

I'm surprised this oligarchy in black robes admits there is a limit to its power!

9 posted on 12/27/2006 10:35:59 AM PST by Rummyfan (Iraq: Give therapeutic violence a chance!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL

Oh berother! They had no problem forcing the state to legalize it in the first place! Talk about the fruitcake capital of America. What a disgusting state.

And, while I have no problem with a black governor, I think that many Massachusetts voters just wanted to prove how 'diverse' they are by electing him. But, folks, he's no David Palmer.


10 posted on 12/27/2006 10:36:39 AM PST by Princip. Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL

Judge Maggie Marshall wasn't even born in this country yet she wants to make the laws and ignore the will of the people. She has accepted awards from gay and lesbian groups yet she failed to recuse herself when this issue came up. She is a disgrace.


11 posted on 12/27/2006 10:38:23 AM PST by ladyjane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL
"Those members who now seek to avoid their lawful obligations, by a vote to recess without a roll call vote ... ultimately will have to answer to the people who elected them," the court said.

HAHAHAHAHA! As if that would ever happen.

The legislature is in violation of the constitution; the governor sues to make them comply; the court weasels out of its responsibility. Talk about the system being broken...this is a complete failure of the Massachusetts government! People should scream about this. Heads should roll. What will happen? Nothing.

12 posted on 12/27/2006 10:48:23 AM PST by cloud8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL

Well, nice to know that the Court acknowledges that it has *some* limitations!


14 posted on 12/27/2006 11:17:36 AM PST by Tanniker Smith (I didn't know she was a liberal when I married her.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL

This from the state of
"No taxation without Representaion!"
and of the Boston Tea Party...

The Gaycoats are not only coming,
..they've come...all over
Massachusettes.


15 posted on 12/27/2006 11:31:41 AM PST by NickatNite2003 (From the Man from Hope" to the wife who snarls "Abandon All Hope!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL

In Massachusetts, the "will of the people" only means anything if the people are on the hard Left. Otherwise, you can pretty much forget it.


19 posted on 12/27/2006 12:07:14 PM PST by Jack Hammer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL
Whatever form of government they have in Mass, it isn't democratic or republican.

Perhaps it's a buttocracy ruled by fagarchs and their dhimmis.
21 posted on 12/27/2006 12:17:22 PM PST by Antoninus ( Rudy McRomney as the GOP nominee = President Hillary. Why else do you think the media loves them?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL

Our courts have hijacked this nation and right of the People to make and live by their own laws!!


25 posted on 12/27/2006 12:28:21 PM PST by Nancee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL

I expect Mary-land to follow exactly the same.


26 posted on 12/27/2006 12:29:09 PM PST by ustanker (The cave dwellers are happy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL

Right, so they can imperiously instruct the legislature to legislate same sex marriage, but they can't tell the legislature to vote on a constitutional amendment when they are required by law to do so...


27 posted on 12/27/2006 12:38:31 PM PST by Unam Sanctam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL

Families with Children. Time to leave MA.


29 posted on 12/27/2006 12:58:29 PM PST by sr4402
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

I'll get it later if you don't!

Grrr - Nazguls.


32 posted on 12/27/2006 2:06:48 PM PST by little jeremiah (Only those who thirst for truth can know truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson