[IsraelBeach]

Of "far-left lies and propaganda."

The U.S. did not invade Iraq on false pretenses,WHERE ARE THE WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION? and "we" WHO DETAINED SADDAM? did not summarily execute him WHO GAVE SADDAM TO THE SHIITES (no, we didn't pull trigger, just passed the gun)- nor did "we" execute him at all.

I wish I was "far-left" it would be less painful.
Next you are going to tell me that Nixon had nothing to do with WaterGate.

And as for "lasting here for so long" - that is what Conservatives describe as free speech and debate. Do you wish to silence everyone you disagree with? That would be very unAmerican. Something that Saddam would do ;>

I am very conservative - but refused to be "played." Rumsfeld resigned. That was a good first step. How many others conservatives here have the guts to speak up? Lastly, please avoid personal attacks. Stick to facts and good, friendly debate :>

You can't solve the problem until you see it!

[MEG33]

I see a "problem".

[SuziQ]

Next you are going to tell me that Nixon had nothing to do with WaterGate.

Get prepared, because he didn't order the break in. From what I've read and seen since all the hoo-hah over Woodward and Bernstein's work, it was John Dean who ordered the break in, and for purely personal reasons. His girlfriend, Mo, who later became his wife, was on a list in a book, in the Dem. Natl Headquarters as an 'escort', and Dean wanted that book, so her name wouldn't be dragged through the muck by the Dems. He sent the Plumbers into the offices to get that book. No other materials were taken, as far as I know, which would have tied the break in to Nixon's re-election, but since it was Dem. headquarters, the media automatically assumed the two were connected.

Nixon's problem was that he covered up Dean's actions, on the mistaken notion that Dean must have been working for Nixon's benefit. Then he just got too far into it, and the damage was done. Nixon resigned because he didn't want the country torn apart, since the media was in their hunter/killer mode.

Again, this is what I've read and heard since. If someone has different info, I'd be happy to be corrected.

[rfp1234]

--WHERE ARE THE WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION? --

Three of them were hanged yesterday.

BTW, can ONE vial of botulinum toxin not kill 1000s of people? How hard is it to conceal it?

[I got the rope]

You do know that we found chemical weapons during Gulf War I right? You do know that the UN ordered him to destroy those chemical weapons right? You do know that he never destroyed them right or at least proved that he did? You do know he threw out the UN observers that were supposed to do this right?

You do know about the 300,000 + bodies that have been found in mass graves in Iraq right?

Victims of Saddam's Regime

[I got the rope]

Chemical Aerial Attack by Saddam's Regime, March 1988

[Republican Wildcat]

Of "far-left lies and propaganda." The U.S. did not invade Iraq on false pretenses,WHERE ARE THE WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION? and "we" WHO DETAINED SADDAM? did not summarily execute him WHO GAVE SADDAM TO THE SHIITES (no, we didn't pull trigger, just passed the gun)- nor did "we" execute him at all.

Like I said, - far-left lies and propaganda. Posting the same baloney over again is not a refutation - it just further proves my point.

[Albion Wilde]

Give it a rest. You are behaving like a provocateur. Your emotional, rhetoric-laden pronunciamentoes lack depth. You're in the wrong venue for shallow leftie tirades. Go away.