Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Balkan Islamic Jihad: A Pan-European calamity
http://www.serbianna.com/columns/michaletos/007.shtml ^

Posted on 12/31/2006 9:33:43 AM PST by kronos77

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260 ... 281-292 next last
To: zimdog
There were no West Africans defending Berlin. Stop lying.

http://www.axishistory.com/index.php?id=877

"Légion des Volontaires Français (LVF), or Infanterie Regiment 638, as it was know to the Germans, was formed July 1941. It was sent to Debica, Poland, for training and it remained there until Oct when it was sent to the Eastern Front attached to 7. Infanterie-Division. It suffered heavy losses during the Soviet winter offensive and the 2. Battalion was almost destroyed but a 3. Battalion was formed from new volunteers (including some 200 colored, mainly arabs from Algeria).

After these losses it operated as individual battalions rather than as a single unit fighting the partisans. It continued fighting the partisans during 1943 but was once again used as a single unit when the all the battalions were attached to 286. Sicherungs-Division.

It merged with Französische SS-Freiwilligen-Sturmbrigade Sep 1944 to form the Waffen-Grenadier Brigade der SS Charlemange."

On April 24, 1945 the last survivors of the 33rd Waffen-SS Charlemagne were transferred to Berlin. They were also the last reinforcements to arrive before the city fell. Only 30 out of 350 survived.

221 posted on 02/20/2007 12:14:56 PM PST by lqclamar ("That's it, Seth, you can't blame them. It's want of education. That's all it is.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 218 | View Replies]

To: lqclamar
It states there were 275K troops in the Tirailleurs Senegalais - a French colonial unit that actually included members from all parts of Africa.

West Africa, not all of Africa.

Nowhere in the article does Sheck give a muslim percentage of those troops.

2/3 of the recruitment pool were Muslims, as Echenberg ably demonstrated. You have since ably demonstrated your willingness to ignore the facts presented by Echenberg.

Sheck stated that 122,000 of them were conscripted in the French West African colonies prior to the 1940 surrender, but only half of those actually made it to France before it fell.

You're either playing with numbers again, or you're lying outright. Scheck is unambiguous in stating that 100,000 troops in France. Two-thirds of them were on the front lines and the rest were completing training behind the lines or in transit. Also, the number of Europeans was, 9,622 -- less than 10%.

"The overall number of Tirailleurs Sénégalais deployed in France between September 3, 1939, and June 25, 1940, was 100,000, but around one-third of them were still in training or in transit when the armistice took effect; see “Troupes Coloniales en 1939 – 1940: La mobilisation et la pe ́ riode d’attente,” L’Ancre d’Or Bazeilles, no. 256 (1990), 27 – 38. For a list of soldiers mobilized in France’s colonies in 1939 – 40, see Fargettas, “Le massacre des soldats,” 2:26. Altogether, over 122,000 people were mobilized in French West Africa before the armistice, including 9,622 Europeans (mostly officers). The Tirailleurs Sénégalais made up the lion’s share of the colonial troops (275,354 men, total), followed by the Indo-Chinese units (88,898 men). "

Some of them even ended up fighting for the Nazis in the aforementioned Vichy colonial units.

Patently false.

222 posted on 02/20/2007 12:16:19 PM PST by zimdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 220 | View Replies]

To: lqclamar

I see your command of geography is worse than your command of history.


223 posted on 02/20/2007 12:17:13 PM PST by zimdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 221 | View Replies]

To: zimdog
West Africa, not all of Africa.

Not true. The Tirailleurs in WWII included both West and Central African French colonies plus an attachment from Madagascar. Of the three, only West Africa had a substantial muslim population.

Scheck is unambiguous in stating that 100,000 troops in France.

"In the campaign of May–June 1940, approximately sixty-six thousand Tirailleurs Se´ne´galais experienced combat in France" - Scheck

Also, the number of Europeans was, 9,622 -- less than 10%.

9,622/120,000 is 8%. 10% is called rounding, though I have little doubt that you're not beneath quibbling over 2%.

"The overall number of Tirailleurs Sénégalais deployed in France between September 3, 1939, and June 25, 1940, was 100,000, but around one-third of them were still in training or in transit when the armistice took effect

Deployment means being ordered to a position. It does not mean they were in France, and Sheck clearly states that they were still in transit to France.

224 posted on 02/20/2007 12:38:11 PM PST by lqclamar ("That's it, Seth, you can't blame them. It's want of education. That's all it is.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 222 | View Replies]

To: lqclamar
Deployment means being ordered to a position. It does not mean they were in France, and Sheck clearly states that they were still in transit to France.

Deployment in France (Sheck's words) mean they were in France.

225 posted on 02/20/2007 12:46:17 PM PST by zimdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 224 | View Replies]

To: lqclamar

It's called playing with the numbers. And since you're entire argument is about the (let's be generous to you) 30,000 Muslim troops of the 18,000,000-strong Nazi forces, I'll say that 2% means a lot to you.


226 posted on 02/20/2007 12:47:46 PM PST by zimdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 224 | View Replies]

To: zimdog

"[Vichy French West Africa Governor General] Boisson exploited the Anglo-Gaullist attack on Dakar and his own fierce resistance to demand that the Germans allow an increase in the size of both the Armée d'Afrique and the colonial army in West Africa to thirty-three thousand men; by mid-1942, it actually approached one hundred thousand men." - French Colonialism Unmasked: The Vichy Years in French West Africa by Ruth Ginio (2006)


227 posted on 02/20/2007 12:56:28 PM PST by lqclamar ("That's it, Seth, you can't blame them. It's want of education. That's all it is.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 223 | View Replies]

To: lqclamar

mostly the white armée d'afrique i'll bet


228 posted on 02/20/2007 1:00:15 PM PST by zimdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 227 | View Replies]

To: zimdog
Deployment in France (Sheck's words) mean they were in France.

Nope. "Before the capitulation some 80,000 African troops had already been sent to France." - Michael Crowder, "Colonial West Africa," 1978, p. 270.

229 posted on 02/20/2007 1:00:23 PM PST by lqclamar ("That's it, Seth, you can't blame them. It's want of education. That's all it is.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 225 | View Replies]

To: zimdog
mostly the white armée d'afrique i'll bet

Betting doesn't cut it though, and indisputably they had muslim colonials as well...something that you called "patently false" in a previous post IIRC.

230 posted on 02/20/2007 1:01:56 PM PST by lqclamar ("That's it, Seth, you can't blame them. It's want of education. That's all it is.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 228 | View Replies]

To: zimdog
And since you're entire argument is about the (let's be generous to you) 30,000 Muslim troops of the 18,000,000-strong Nazi forces

Interesting you mention that. Let's update the known totals of Muslims who fought for the Nazis...

1. 13th, 21st, and 23rd SS - 30,000 muslims between them (21K from the 13th, plus majorities from the 21st and 23rd, which had about 13,000 between them, so 30K is probably pretty accurate).

2. Deutsche Arabisches Infantry Battalion No. 845 - 6,300 Arab Muslim colonial troops

3. Phalange Africana - 400 member arab nazi militia

4. 950th Infantry Regiment "Indian" - 1,600 muslims out of 3,000 troops

5. Légion des Volontaires Français Battalion 3 - at least 200 African muslims

6. Rashid Ali al-Kilani's forces - at least 10,000 based on that many casualties recorded by the British.

7. Osttürkischer Waffen-Verband der SS - 8,500 turkistani and arab members.

That puts our running total at 57,000 right now. Of course we know the total of Nazi muslims is significantly higher than that because there are several known nazi muslim units that we don't have complete figures for yet. Among them:

- The rest of Rashid Ali al-Kilani's army
- Other muslims in the Légion des Volontaires Français
- Muslim members of the 100,000 Vichy French troops under Boisson in French West Africa
- Muslim Bosnians who fought for the Ustashe Nazi Croat regime
- Muslim members of the Kaukasischen Waffen-Verband der SS - had 5,000 total from the Caucases region, including muslim Azerbaijanis.
- SS Waffengruppe "Krim" - number of Chechen muslims

With 57,000 already established, it is not unreasonable to expect that the remainder of the aforementioned units would raise the total muslim nazi count to over 100,000.

231 posted on 02/20/2007 1:25:17 PM PST by lqclamar ("That's it, Seth, you can't blame them. It's want of education. That's all it is.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 226 | View Replies]

To: zimdog

Islam is just another name for Nazi with a Prayer rug. Simple.

As far as my comment, "Most Muslims are of ME decent"....I guess I was wrong. I thought that mecca was in Saudi, I suppose that it's in Germany or France. Oh, and the Pilgrims didn't bring their idea of Christianity, they brought prayer rugs instead. Opppps, my fault in not knowing history. lolol...:)

They must pay you well, or they must be wasting their salary for your part time job.


232 posted on 02/20/2007 11:03:50 PM PST by tgambill (I would like to comment.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies]

To: zimdog

Oh, you are a novice with your methods. I will say they taught you well. I certainly can't ask you to verify much since you don't provide much. You do the old round circle, and use the techniques they taught you to create disinformation among facts.


233 posted on 02/20/2007 11:06:15 PM PST by tgambill (I would like to comment.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]

To: kronos77

Dear Kronos: Please read posts 207 and 212 and give me your opinion or response.

Thanks...LIBO


234 posted on 02/20/2007 11:28:23 PM PST by LjubivojeRadosavljevic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 202 | View Replies]

To: Christopher Lincoln

Well, supporting Bosnian islamists Iran made a strike in the haert of the enemy. Sewnding Islamists and aid into creating a islamic state in Europe is much more lucrative idea than fighting for damn hills in Afghanistan.


235 posted on 02/21/2007 2:04:02 AM PST by kronos77 (-www.savekosovo.org- and -www.kosovo.net- Save Kosovo from Islam!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies]

To: LjubivojeRadosavljevic

OK, here I am. What is now wrong with Hoppy?


236 posted on 02/21/2007 2:06:11 AM PST by kronos77 (-www.savekosovo.org- and -www.kosovo.net- Save Kosovo from Islam!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 234 | View Replies]

To: kronos77; Hoplite
Kronos: ["OK, here I am. What is now wrong with Hoppy?"]

Me: Does the following correspondence have any relevence to either of the two of you?

Kronos:["Hoppy, have your ears grown on your butt so when you sit down cant hear a thing?...

Most vicious prosecution of Serbs and Jews accured after surrender of Itally, leaving itallian occupied zones to Germans and their demented ustasha-Croate allies."]

If this is the case, then let me know. Or, Hoplite is the issue more general?...Which is what I suspect the case is, but you're not being clear on the matter that you raised with me.
237 posted on 02/21/2007 10:15:17 PM PST by LjubivojeRadosavljevic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 236 | View Replies]

To: LjubivojeRadosavljevic
Most vicious prosecution

That was the offending instance - I regret not having been clear from the start.

238 posted on 02/23/2007 6:39:54 PM PST by Hoplite
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 237 | View Replies]

To: Hoplite
Kronos:["Most vicious prosecution...]

Hoplite: ["That was the offending instance - I regret not having been clear from the start."]

Me: Hoplite, thanks for your response. I understand your concern and I will take this issue up directly with Kronos.

You went to the right person.
239 posted on 02/23/2007 11:27:38 PM PST by LjubivojeRadosavljevic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 238 | View Replies]

To: lqclamar

page #?


240 posted on 02/24/2007 8:28:13 PM PST by zimdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 227 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260 ... 281-292 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson