Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: indcons
These people are out of touch with reality.

Federal district court judges are paid $165,200 ...The issue of pay, says Roberts, "has now reached the level of a constitutional crisis."

4 posted on 01/01/2007 7:31:26 AM PST by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: DManA

There's no reason they should make over 100k, imo. But with all the extra tax revenue from the private property seizures, they could certainly afford a raise...


17 posted on 01/01/2007 7:42:08 AM PST by The Worthless Miracle (I think Jamie Dupree is annoying.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: DManA
These people are out of touch with reality.

Federal district court judges are paid $165,200 ...The issue of pay, says Roberts, "has now reached the level of a constitutional crisis."

It's all about outside options. If a decent lawyer can make well over $165,200 being a lawyer, then what incentive does he have to become a judge? If lawyers are financially motivated, then the only lawyers that would become a judge are those who cannot earn $165,200 being a lawyer.

It's not being out of touch with reality. It's asking the question of whether we want our judges to be lawyers who could not make it.

BTW, I have no idea what the payscale is for lawyers. I'm only assuming that good lawyers should easily be able to clear $165,200. Maybe I'm wrong.

170 posted on 01/01/2007 9:23:11 AM PST by undeniable logic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: DManA

I wish WE had $165,000 a year to live on. But we probably never will unless we get the Publisher's Clearing House to knock on our door. I will be content on what we have and live within our means, which might help these poor people to be able to manage their small amount of money (hah!).


199 posted on 01/01/2007 9:43:00 AM PST by Marysecretary (GOD IS STILL IN CONTROL.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: DManA

These people are out of touch with reality."

Not their reality.

Their reality is they're better than the masses and deserve more.


226 posted on 01/01/2007 9:56:47 AM PST by philetus (Keep doing what you always do and you'll keep getting what you always get.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: DManA
If you consider these guys in private practice easily would make 600k a year, to ask them to serve the country for 150k is well bellow private sector pay.

I could see doubling their wages.

At the same time I can see bring back a treasure trove to the budget by cutting all other government jobs pay and benefits down to what the private sector gets as well.
456 posted on 01/01/2007 6:28:35 PM PST by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: DManA

To be quite honest, while $165k a year is nothing to sneeze at, it doesn't afford the standard of living in the DC area that it does in most of the country. Still quite adequate, but not as high as it sounds. It SHOULD pay enough to encourage private-practice lawyers to be interested in it.


522 posted on 01/02/2007 2:14:03 PM PST by RockinRight (To compare Congress to drunken sailors is an insult to drunken sailors. - Ronald W. Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: DManA
These people are out of touch with reality.

I agree. $165,000 per year is a crisis? Now, I understand they must maintain two residences and their children simply must attend private scool and the best colleges. And what about wifey's wardrobe?
Oh yeah. 165K per year must be a real struggle when you have no concept of how to live within your means.

540 posted on 01/02/2007 4:29:29 PM PST by Bloody Sam Roberts (This is my tagline. There are many like it but this one is mine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson