Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TheCrusader
Yes but you take my "I don't care" out of context, which is don't ask don't tell. If a soldier executes his duty, then who can slight him. And if there was a reliable "gay" test, I would advocate for no gays in the military, but the fact is, there simply is none.

I do care, but don't ask don't tell seems to be a lot better than what is being suggested Shalikashvili. I guess he is a Bill Clinton fan.

If gays are "allowed to serve" , then everyone who registers as "gay" will have a way to attack disciplinary procedures in the service for prejudicial reasons.As amatter of fact, how would anyone prove they were gay? That means we would create a whole new class of soldier, one whose duty is sometimes avoidable.

I think that there should be a gay test for all military personnel, but short of an outright admission, there just is no relaible test that I know of yet. That is the problem. So don't ask, don't tell, and the classification of homosexuality as a disorder by the military is what we are left with.In that sense, I do not care what a soldiers sexuality is, as long as duty is done.

86 posted on 01/02/2007 6:14:29 PM PST by Candor7 (Into Liberal flatulance goes the best hope of the West, and who wants to be a smart feller?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies ]


To: Candor7
"If a soldier executes his duty, then who can slight him. And if there was a reliable "gay" test, I would advocate for no gays in the military, but the fact is, there simply is none."

Another fact is, most men detest homosexual perverts, and certainly don't desire to have one living amongst them in close, intimate quarters. These perverts tend to make people queezy because of their twisted sexual appetites, and certainly most men do not relate to these bizarre, depraved desires. A military full of homosexual perverts will be a military that many good Christian men will absolutely avoid, and this is not good.

I'm not saying that a homosexual pervert is incapable of being a soldier, I'm saying that that is red herring argument. Good soldiering requires a strong, cohesive unity amongst the guys, something that a flaming homosexual deviant probably will never be able to foster among normal men. He will eventually drift towards other homosexual perverts nearby, and the sick 'trists' amongst them will inevitably occur. These "gays" will be secretly hated by most of the other troops, no matter how many 'equal rights' laws they enact to intimidate people in 'embracing' them.

But hey, if this is what today's Soldiers and Marines want to have, go for it. We seem to be going to Hell in a handbasket anway, and not many seem to want to stop the slide into the pit. I'm just glad I saw a better day, when there was still some light shining on peoples' souls.

144 posted on 01/03/2007 8:33:02 AM PST by TheCrusader
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson