Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: indcons
And Australia has humiliated the "spineless wonders" many a time in the last 20 years...LOL.

Flintoff made a terrible mistake declaring in the Second Test. He should have kept batting even if England had run up 1000 runs. The longer England batted, the longer McGrath and Warne would have had to stay out in that heat. Instead, England folded in the second innings and became the first team to declare with 550 in the first innings and lose.

Of course, batting longer would have only resulted in a draw, since England had no clue how to take wickets.

14 posted on 01/05/2007 1:42:03 PM PST by You Dirty Rats (I Love Free Republic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: You Dirty Rats

Yes, but a draw wouldn't have hurt England as they were only down 1-0 at that point. Going down 2-0 with three tests to play was a killer.


15 posted on 01/08/2007 9:31:51 AM PST by BaBaStooey (I heart Emma Caulfield.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson