Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: soccermom

The depth of your reading and activism must be very shallow.

First, Reagan had a Democrat majority Senate to contend with and probably did the best he could at the time. Second; on the judiciary specifically, there has never been a mantra of "back to Reagan", while there has been a push for more originalists in the mode of Scalia and Thomas.

Or, maybe you are just pushing Dim talking points, like a troll.


277 posted on 01/08/2007 8:41:42 PM PST by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 273 | View Replies ]


To: Wuli

There has been a mantra of "Back to Reagan" by most every conservative pundit since we lost the election. If anything is "shallow", it is that prescription for today's problems.


279 posted on 01/08/2007 8:44:23 PM PST by soccermom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 277 | View Replies ]

To: Wuli
SMom has been around here a long time Newbie!

You have a lot to learn about respecting those who have seen a whole lot more battles than you can account for.
281 posted on 01/08/2007 8:48:30 PM PST by PSYCHO-FREEP (MAYNARD BLAZEJEWSKI For President '08 (The "true" conservative choice))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 277 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson