Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: cgk

253 to 174 - I thought the title was wrong.


5 posted on 01/11/2007 12:32:19 PM PST by edcoil (Reality doesn't say much - doesn't need too)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: edcoil

We're not obtaining a sustainable population number, but yet abortion still has support? Guess that says quite a lot about people's lack of long term outlook- just because we're an abundant population now doesn't mean we are goign to remain one- we're are in serious trouble because parents are not having enough children to sustain our population- this nation WILL dissappear, but abortion advocates could care less as long as women can presently have sex without the consequences of prenancy impeeding on their lifestyles. pleasure over common sense.

The following link does not relate to this thread http://sacredscoop.com


7 posted on 01/11/2007 12:37:23 PM PST by CottShop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: edcoil

Sorry about my typo; I've asked the Moderator to correct that for me.


11 posted on 01/11/2007 12:40:33 PM PST by cgk (I don't see myself as a conservative. I see myself as a religious, right-wing, wacko extremist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: edcoil

shuler watch, he voted no


64 posted on 01/11/2007 2:54:47 PM PST by italianquaker (Democrats its time to fish or cut bait, no more blaming Prez Bush.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson