Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Toddsterpatriot
The statistics for sugar cane consumption vs HFCS consumption are hard for me to find. However, the use of HFCS is a food production choice because of its ease of use in product production. Because of its liquid quality, HFCS is easier than cane sugar to mix into the ingredients. It requires less energy and mechanical complexity in food production.

"I predict that the use of HFCS as a fuel source in the production of methanol will drive the price upward as it competes for its use in the food industry."

This was recently posted on the Free Republic as verification of the above statement:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1766482/posts

51 posted on 01/13/2007 9:02:37 AM PST by jonrick46
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]


To: jonrick46
However, the use of HFCS is a food production choice because of its ease of use in product production.

Don't forget that it is also used because tariffs and restrictions on sugar imports makes our sugar about twice as expensive as sugar on the world market.

This was recently posted on the Free Republic as verification of the above statement:

That thread did not mention methanol.

52 posted on 01/13/2007 10:08:31 AM PST by Toddsterpatriot (There is no cause so right that one cannot find a fool following it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson