[Szent_Adam_Kiraly]

"You don't think results should be reviewed? This doesn't affect seismological information as you implied. It creates a reviewal process in the government which IMHO is sorely needed and should be explored."


Why does the govt need to review the results pre-publication? Publication doesnt nullify scientific findings from criticism.

This could very well effect seismological data.
"— prior to any submission for publication — “of findings or data that may be especially newsworthy, have an impact on government policy, or contradict previous public understanding to ensure that proper officials are notified and that communication strategies are developed.”"

The govt can already review and criticize scientific findings post publication. Political pressure on science, makes objectivity and investigational integrity more difficult.

[kinoxi]

Why does the govt need to review the results pre-publication? Publication doesnt nullify scientific findings from criticism.

From an individual no. From the USGS it needs to be verified.

I don't share your faith in scientific altruism. These are tax dollars and should be monitored unless you suggest writing a blank check...

[rabidralph]

Why does the govt need to review the results pre-publication? Publication doesnt nullify scientific findings from criticism.

Maybe the public affairs staff would like to know what is going out the door in their behalf before it goes. That way they can check it for adherence to department policy and answer questions about it to the press once it's released. You know how scientists and engineers are the most camera-ready, people-friendly group on the Earth?

I worked at a government agency in public affairs and nothing went out the door unless it was reviewed by other scientists, such as the department heads, and the communications manager. If we got calls from the public or press, we could pass the call to the communications manager. There's nothing out of the ordinary going on here. Every organization does it.