Posted on 01/12/2007 5:43:01 AM PST by nuconvert
Intelligence Services Believe the Natanz Site is a Front
January 11, 2007 Associated Press USA Today
VIENNA -- Iran's uranium enrichment program appears stalled despite tough talk from the Tehran leadership, leaving intelligence services guessing about why the country has not made good on plans to press ahead with activities that the West fears could be used to make nuclear arms, diplomats said Thursday. Outside monitoring of Iran's nuclear endeavors is restricted to International Atomic Energy Agency inspections of declared sites, leaving significant blind spots for both the agency and intelligence agencies of member countries trying to come up with the full picture.
Still, Tehran's reluctance to crank up activities at its declared enrichment site at Natanz when it seems to have the technical know-how for at least experimental work is puzzling the diplomatic and intelligence communities — with some saying it was potentially worrisome.
Diplomats accredited or otherwise linked to the Vienna-based IAEA said some intelligence services believed the Natanz site is a front.
While the world's attention is focused on Natanz, Iranian scientists and military personnel could be working on a secret enrichment program at one or more unknown sites that is much more advanced, the diplomats, who demanded anonymity in exchange for discussing restricted information, said.
(Excerpt) Read more at iranvajahan.net ...
Exactly the point where I stopped reading...
You may have stopped reading, but you shouldn't totally disregard the notion.
Those anonymous diplomats aren't the only ones who think this
You should have kept reading for a good laugh:
"The diplomats said that suggests possible Iranian hesitancy to provoke U.N. Security Council sanctions harsher than the relatively mild penalties agreed last month in response to Tehran's refusal to heed an August council deadline to suspend enrichment."
LOL...the IAEA/UN folks are delusional!!
"....you shouldn't totally disregard the notion."
I don't think anyone disregards the notion, just disregards 'anounymous' sources (imho). Let's hope that our intelligence agencies have taken the possibility into account years ago!
You can think that this is all a joke, (and some of it may be ridiculous) but using Natanz as a diversion from the real site would be standard operating procedure for the mullahs.
Good call.
"Let's hope that our intelligence agencies have taken the possibility into account years ago!"
I seriously doubt that, but I hope they're on to it now.
This bluff could be a bluff. Their leader is pretty much the politician. The islamofascists have stones to throw, lets hope their aim isn't as good as David's was.
You may know something that others don't, so please tell us what the mullahs have done or are doing that would give any indication that this is a standard operating procedure. I dare say that we really don't have enough inormation to deduce what their standard operating procedure is.
This reminds me of the old hidden pea under the walnut con. The solution is to take out the pea hidden in the Carny's pocket.
SOP by the regime : create a diversion so no one sees what you're really doing.
I don't think that's a big secret.
"To disperse there nuclear program so that no single attack can take it all out."
Yup. And they've built underneath major cities, so that an attack would result in large losses of life.
lol- the U.N might impose a 'no soup for you' sanction against them - that'll teach em
If there are dozens of these underground complexes and tunnels, who's to say what they are? There's nothing illegal about subterranean building projects.
What if it's done underneath cities and they say they're building subways or installing underground pipes or whatever?
And mining is big business in Iran. Who's to say it doesn't have to do with that?
They've been building these tunnels, etc for many yrs and mining for many yrs more so they have the equipment.
I was wondering if Ah-ma-nut-job's recent popularity (sarcasm-actually his party was completely routed)in the previous elections that if their reactor was to be taken out and a nuclear cloud was to move say.....easterly over the populated countryside "killing allah's true believers indiscriminately" that perhaps the populus would revolt and hold both Ah-ma-nut-job and his Mullah buddies from the end of a rope that was attached to their necks for public display.
It's just a theory........
lol...or maybe institute another 'Oil For Food' program...(rolling eyes)
You mean that they would disregard the key SHia thought: i.e., Armageddon is a good thing, because if everyone is wiped out including the Shiites, only the Shiites (the True Believers) will enjoy paradise; with infidels and bad Muslims as their slaves forever and presumably ever?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.