[Owen]

This is largely pointless.

To get corruption dirt on Democrats you must have indictable evidence. Not suspicions. Evidence. The media is not going to fund investigations into a Democrat unless a district attorney already has and has persuaded a Grand Jury to indict.

So do not bother with this stuff. Get the goods and get it to a DA, and there are better targets for this than a town where she has all the DA machinery bought. Target other Dems, especially in red districts where DAs would be more receptive to such evidence.

[paltz]

Agreed, but along with your suggestion of going after red state DEMS, it's important to put this info out to the public mindset, to further show how corrupt the dem party is at large: Their "culture of corruption".

[SierraWasp]

What? You're sayin we should give up and give in to these swingin leftist hipocrites and just lie back and enjoy their pilage and plantation building? This is the same climate that spawned the Jim Jones death cult and was made even more corrupt by Willie Brown (who just made Arnold Schwartzenfrauder a legitimate "centrist" by exposing the new leftward tilt of his maladministration).

That's right. Lets all be good little Republicans and practice political judo until we completely clean up the deviant destruction brought upon various puss pockets of America while we sleep!!! Phhhhhhhhhhht!!!

[tiger-one]

Any PI's in FR???

[Republic Rocker]

The DA's won't move.... they r controlled by fishface and the leftist government that employs them......

[longtermmemmory]

The MSM has specific criteral for it being "safe" to go after a democrat:

1. The democrat must be out of office
2. The democrat must be ALREADY indicted
3. The democrat idealy must be dead
4. The democrat must have expressed support or admiration for GWBush.
5. The democrat must be an admitted heterosexual who is not adicted to drugs.
6. The democrat must have confessed in public to not having any mistresses or extramarital affairs.