Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

USS John C. Stennis Deploys with Carrier Strike Group 3
Navy Newstand ^ | 01/16/2007 | By Mass Communication Specialist 2nd Class (AW/NAC) Eric J. Rowley Fleet Public Affairs Center Detac

Posted on 01/16/2007 4:11:12 PM PST by flynmudd

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 last
To: prophetic

God be with all branches of the US military and those of our allies.


41 posted on 01/16/2007 6:29:29 PM PST by flynmudd (Proud Navy Mom to OSSA Blalock-DDG 61)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: GitmoSailor
I did four Carriers,

Better see a doctor.

42 posted on 01/16/2007 7:07:52 PM PST by Cobra64 (www.BulletBras.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: zarf
The women called him Stennis the Menace. The chicks wouldn't have sex with him because he was a carrier.

If you don't know what you are talking about, don't! John Stennis was an honorable man and there was no scandal, period, where he was involved.

43 posted on 01/16/2007 7:10:43 PM PST by Mind-numbed Robot (Not all that needs to be done, needs to be done by the government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Past Your Eyes
Do you suppose there will ever be a ship named after Barney Frank?

The extremely ill-advised practice of naming CVNs after politicians makes that quite likely, IMO.

If you think the USS George HW Bush and the USS Gerald Ford were good ideas, get ready for the USS Bill Clinton, coming soon.

44 posted on 01/16/2007 7:28:00 PM PST by Jim Noble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: flynmudd

Seaman recruit Schools is absolutely correct about that first sunset at sea.


45 posted on 01/16/2007 7:50:36 PM PST by longhorn too
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: flynmudd; Seadog Bytes; Ernest_at_the_Beach; ASA Vet; BIGLOOK; Dog; Dog Gone; Cindy

If Tehran Knew!:

"In America, they lie for tactical reasons, stating over and over that military action against Iran is unlikely. However in Iran, out of ignorance, they reiterate that American military action against their country is impossible because the US is "unable" to do so!

We say and hope our analysis is wrong. A possible military strike against Iranian nuclear facilities is in the final stages. Unless a political miracle occurs that revives the halted dialog between Iran and the international community, Iran and its neighboring countries should not be surprised by a scenario that includes American military action. "

Just maybe, President Bush is purposely allowing the media and the left to spout their garbage in order to create the illusion that we are completely incapable of taking any action against Iran. It would come as a complete surprise if we did take action.

Iranian Map: Before our upcoming Victory:

Iranian Map: After our upcoming Victory:

Over the past week, the U.S. Navy has given orders to the U.S.S. John Stennis carrier battle group, based in Bremerton, WA, to steam toward the Persian Gulf, where it will join the U.S.S. Dwight D. Eisenhower.

Navy sources say the Pentagon is getting ready to announce the dispatch of a third carrier battle group – the U.S.S. Ronald Reagan – from San Diego. That will make three carrier battle groups in the region starting at around the end of January.

Oh, and along with them is the amphibious assault group led by the U.S.S. Boxer, which can land several thousand U.S. Marines to seize and destroy strategic sites near the coast at a moment’s notice. (Busheir? Bandar Abbas? Jask? The three Persian Gulf islands Iran seized from the UAE in the 1990s and has since fortified to harass Gulf shipping? Your pick).

A Quote from: The Dogs of War - Lessons of the 20th Century. By Victor Davis Hanson, (author most recently of Carnage and Culture: Landmark Battles in the Rise of Western Power):

"I would not wish to fight the United States - either militarily, politically, or culturally. For every threat, our history teaches us that Americans offer not just a rejoinder, but the specter of a devastating answer of a magnitude almost inconceivable to those now chanting and threatening in the streets of the Middle East.

Do they have any idea of what sort of dangerous people we really are? Do they understand the history of the names of those ships now off their coasts, like the USS Peleliu or Enterprise, or the pedigree of the 82nd or 101st Airborne?"



Click The Pic To Donate

To others reading this: "If you are reading this and don't donate to Free Republic, you are probably a liberal or CINO Freeploader! Real conservatives don't mooch off of others. They pay their share! "

46 posted on 01/17/2007 7:34:28 AM PST by Grampa Dave (GW has more Honor and Integrity in his little finger than ALL of the losers on the "hate Bush" band)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson