Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

This will impact the space weaponization debate
Space Politics ^ | January 18, 2007 | Jeff Foust

Posted on 01/18/2007 4:58:01 AM PST by Cincinatus' Wife

Remember all the debate in the weeks and months following the release of the new national space policy that the US was opening the door to the weaponization of space—and perhaps imperiling the security of its own space assets—by appearing to go down the road of space weaponization? Now comes work from Aviation Week that

China tested, apparently successfully, an anti-satellite weapon earlier this month. The ASAT, fired from a Chinese spaceport, hit and apparently destroyed an aging Chinese polar-orbiting weather satellite on January 11. (ArmsControlWonk also had some discussion about the ASAT test shortly before the Aviation Week article was published Wednesday evening.)

It will be interesting to see how people on both sides of the space weaponization debate spin this. Is it a sign that the Chinese were not sincere in their opposition to space weaponization, and that therefore the US need to step up its defensive and offensive counterspace efforts, or does it reflect a failure of US policy (including claims that there is no "arms race in space")? Or both?


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 01/18/2007 4:58:02 AM PST by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

THANK YOU BILL CLINTON !!!!

Your name will be a curseword in the future.....
2 posted on 01/18/2007 5:34:11 AM PST by wodinoneeye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

Setting aside the whole issue of space weaponization...

Wouldn't it have been better for everyone using space to have had a single, large, aging satellite in orbit as opposed to millions of little bits of former said satellite? Unless the Chinese have perfected a disintegrator, they have effectively seeded the area with millions of difficult to track, and dangerous (for other satellites) projectiles.

Doesn't seem very bright, which leads me to believe that they were intent on proving a point, regardless of the collateral damage.


3 posted on 01/18/2007 6:04:43 AM PST by CertainInalienableRights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CertainInalienableRights

The particles will not remail in orbit...they will scatter if what is being reported is true!


4 posted on 01/18/2007 6:10:33 AM PST by gr8eman (Everybody is a rocket scientist...until launch day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: gr8eman
From the link in the post to aviationnow.com:

"The test, if it occurred as envisioned by intelligence source, could also have left considerable space debris in an orbit used by many different satellites. "

Do you have other info that these will fall out of orbit relatively quickly? I just want to be sure I grasp the ramifications of this test, beyond the political.
5 posted on 01/18/2007 6:26:33 AM PST by CertainInalienableRights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: CertainInalienableRights

Polar Orbiting satellites aren't for weather, they are for targeting MIRVs. The Chinese just sent us a message that they can kill our satellites. We can kill theirs also. We call them Brilliant Pebbles.


6 posted on 01/18/2007 6:47:05 AM PST by massgopguy (I owe everything to George Bailey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
"Space Weaponization." This phrase seems to have appeared right before my eyes. I have heard the term Weaponization used to describe turning things like anthrax into weapons. This new term seems to suggest that we are making space into a weapon. I think the proper term would be Militarization, putting the military in space.

The author of this piece is an idiot. He thinks the Chinese are only trying to build a military capability for space because they are reacting to the US. They are trying to get a leg up on us. They don't want to catch up to us, they want to pass us up. The fact is we should have had space stations and space weapons long ago.

7 posted on 01/18/2007 6:52:08 AM PST by webheart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: webheart
The author of this piece is an idiot.

He has a PhD in planetary science.

He thinks the Chinese are only trying to build a military capability for space because they are reacting to the US.

Nothing he wrote indicates that he thinks such a thing.

8 posted on 01/18/2007 6:56:01 AM PST by NonZeroSum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson