Posted on 01/18/2007 11:15:10 AM PST by Froufrou
Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke warned Congress Thursday that the economy could be gravely hurt if Social Security and Medicare aren't revamped and urged lawmakers to tackle the nation's thorny fiscal issues sooner rather than later.
"If early and meaningful action is not taken, the U.S. economy could be seriously weakened," Bernanke said in testimony to the Senate Budget Committee.
It marked the Fed chief's most forceful warning to date on the potential problems facing the United States with the looming retirement of 78 million baby boomers, the oldest of whom will start retiring next year.
This huge wave of retirees will hit the U.S. budget as well as the economy, he said.
"The longer we wait, the more severe, the more draconian, the more difficult the objectives are going to be. I think the right time to start was about 10 years ago," he told lawmakers when questioned about the urgency of the situation.
Absent policy changes by Congress and the White House, rising budget deficits are likely in the years ahead to increase the amount of federal debt outstanding to unprecedented levels, Bernanke said.
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
I think I'm going to try the Jim Freedom retirement plan...works for Jim!
Be afraid, be very afraid. The Clintoons considered snatching all IRAs and 401Ks and rolling them into the SS funds.........
Ohno! We didn't GWB take this bull by the horns when he had the chance?
Poor guy, do you need any help with those chores? If you do, you know where to e-mail me...
Allow me to introduce myself. I'm Graybeard 58. Now you know one who isn't bored and has no desire to go back to work. I am as busy as I want to be and as lazy as I want to be. To me it's freedom. I retired in Dec. 1999 at age 54.
You couldn't be more wrong. The program is unsustainable as now structured. In 1950, there were 16 workers to every retiree, today there are 3.3, and in 2030 there will be 2 workers for every retiree. Almost half of the national debt is comprised of the SS Trust Fund, which is filled with non-market T-bills, which are really unfunded liabillities and not assets.
In order to "pay it back," we would have to borrow the money, which increases the costs of the servicing the national debt, which takes 17 cents of every federal dollar. SS is a pay as you go system and should be made a regular part of the budget. The SS "surplus" starts declining in 2008 and will go in the red in 2017. The only real long term solution is private accounts.
Are you married?......
"Golly, who woulda thunk it?" he observed.
Outstanding! JimFreedom Oct 2001 at age 52. FREEDOM! (think Braveheart, LOL)
Same here, Graybeard. My husband retired at 54, worked one more year under a special contract and then I retired with him at age 41. It's been 9 years and I'm not bored yet. What am I doing wrong? LOL
I've stayed at home raising my kids. Going back to work, I plan on working for as long as I can. I have many fries who can't wait to retire. My inlaws who retired 15 years ago, have NO schedule, sleep in all day are up all night and have no goals in their life.
I do not want this for myself. I want to remain productive for as long as I can. So looking forward to re-entering the workforce.
This shouldn't be an issue with 20-30 million folks from the deep, deep south coming to the rescue.
I am happily married, my wife still works by her own choice. Her job involves a lot of travel and I go where she goes when I want to and stay at home when I want to.
I'm not trying to sell anyone on retirement it does work for some however.
Some retirees are just as you described, I have friends who retired, one of them took a job at a car wash soon after retirement and I know for a fact that it wasn't for the money.Another frind, an avid hunter/fisherman used to spend all his free time hunting or fishing, now all of his tiime is free time, it's hard to ever find him at home.
But, but, I distinctly remember Harry Reid and the Dems say in '06 there was no problem, the fund is sustainable until 2080 and that there was no need for Bush to rile everyone up over a nonproblem. Was I mistaken?
The deep south? Mexico, home of all the job-seekers who do the jobs we won't?
No, I remember that, too. Reid, indeed!
Ping list for the discussion of the politics and social (and sometimes nostalgic) aspects that directly effects Generation Reagan / Generation-X (Those born from 1965-1981) including all the spending previous generations are doing that Gen-X and Y will end up paying for.
Freep mail me to be added or dropped. See my home page for details and previous articles.
A good retirement means..., doing what you want to do..., when you want to do it! Unless someone has an all-consuming hobby or personal pursuit (VERY difficult to do if it doesn't already exist), a balance of reduced work schedule and other activities is the ideal. I've known many people who, having retired, have no idea of what to do AND..., if they don't go back to work or develop an all consuming hobby..., they just DIE!
No matter what you think you would really "Love to do" in retirement (regardless of your economic status), reality will set in in short order!
If they would have done the SS program like FDR had planned it in the first place, it was supposed to be privatized. But once Congress got their grimy little hands on it, it got wasted.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.