Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

End-Of-Life Care For Homeless Patients
The Journal of the American Medical Association | 17 December 2006 | Perspectives On Care Editor

Posted on 01/18/2007 5:45:05 PM PST by shrinkermd

On december 27,2006, kusheland miaskowski' introduced Mr K, a 66-year-old African Ameri­can man who has lived on the streets for nearly 50 years and for most of those years has used heroin and other illicit drugs daily. Mr K was diagnosed with advanced renal adenocarcinoma in February 2002 at a large urban hospital. For unclear reasons, resection was made con­tingent upon cessation of drug use and was not done.

There­after, Mr K was lost to follow up for almost a year, until he presented to the emergency department with abdominal pain and heroin withdrawal. He was then referred for palliative care to Dr E, in the hospital's palliative care clinic.

As the authors describe, homelessness annually affects an estimated 2.3 to 3.5 million individuals living in the United States. Homeless people face difficulties meeting their ba­sic needs; many struggle with substance abuse, have men­tal illness, lack social support, and lack medical insurance.

These challenges complicate the homeless patient's ability to engage in end-of-life advanced planning, adhere to medi­cations, and find a fitting site to receive terminal care. How­ever, as demonstrated by Mr K and Dr E, trusting relation­ships can be formed between homeless patients and their clinicians, and effective palliative care can be delivered.' Us­ing a mullidiscipHilary team can help address the many needs and improve the care of homeless patients.

For patients who continue to use illicit substances while receiving end-of-life care, Kushel and Miaskowski1 recom­mend scheduling frequent clinic visits, using long-acting pain medications, dispensing small quantities of medications at a time, and developing a written pain agreement. Because homeless people are less likely to have a surrogate decision maker, clinicians should have frequent, well-documented conversations with them about their end-of-life wishes. Homeless people can rarely use hospice services because they lack the financial resources for inpatieni hospice and have neither the home nor the social support required for home hospice. Developing inpatient palliative care services at hos­pitals that serve many homeless people could improve their end-of-life care.

Dr E was reinterviewed in August 2006

dr E: Believe it or not, Mr K is still alive. He appears to have some metosloses to the lung now, as wed as Lo Lhe ribs and spine.

He is a candidate for hospice and has been on it in the past, but things did not go too well. He does not like to have to stay in one place. Consequently, it was very hard for the hospice people to find him, even when he supposedly had a fixed address. He also felt that they were trying to tell him what to do, which he resented. He and the hospice agency parted ways after a few months, and he has not been interested in pursuing it again.

About a year ago, October 2005, Mr K presented with con­fusion, no! eating, feeling lousy. Always before, he had re­jected the idea of dialysis. But at this admission, he felt so badly that he capitulated. He is on dialysis because of end-stage re­nal disease, probably secondary to a combination of factors (he declined kidney biopsy) .. . including heroin use and hepati­tis C, [and] a lifetime of uncontrolled hypertension.

It has been very difficult to get him to comply with antihypertensives. Af­ter several years of chronic renal insufficiency, he now pre­sented with uremic symptoms and electrolyte abnormalilies and elected to remain on dialysis because it made him fed so much better. I don't know that the stage of cancer is necessarily im­portant in relation to the dialysis—even though the cancer is very advanced, the symptomatic benefit is substantial.

He and I had talked a lot about his drug use, but ihe deci­sion to quit was his own, and he. quit withoutformal interven­tion. He tells me he is not using heroin anymore because he does not have the energy "to hustle for it."

His social situation continues to be a little problematic. He bounces from place to place but adamantly refuses nursing home placement. For a while, he lived with a young, woman. Eventu­ally, (his living arrangement ended. He remains very cheerful and positive through it all and comes to visit us once a month. At this visit, we make sure his pain is controlled, talk about where he is staying and how to get in touch, as this changes frequently. The thing that makes me the happiest about this is that in every ear­lier interaction with the health care system, Mr K hasjled, but we've really forged a great relationship, he has stayed with us, and I feel that this is a real accomplishment.

AmyJ, Markowitz, JD Stephen J. MePhee, MD

1. Kushel MB, Miaskowski C. End-of-life care for homeless patients


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News
KEYWORDS: bioethics; care; endoflifecare; health; homeless; qualityoflife
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last
I am posting this to document how long people can actually be "homeless" (50 years since age 16) and how long they can survive almost daily substance habituation (Heroin) and yet quit when they are old and ill.

The issues of homelessness are more complex for the troubled and troubling alchohol and substance habituation user. This is an extreme case, but problems similar to this are common.

1 posted on 01/18/2007 5:45:08 PM PST by shrinkermd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd
I hope this doesn't turn into the usual homeless bashing thread on FR.

It breaks my heart to see people living on the streets.

I donate money to homeless shelters here in Philly regularly.

2 posted on 01/18/2007 5:53:44 PM PST by Jorge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jorge
Yes, I applaud your efforts. I ran a residential facility for the serious and persistently mentally ill for almost 15 years. I changed my mind completely as to what the problem is.

The people I received off the street were uniformly serious ill with dual disabilities (usually) of substance habituation and mental illness. Not infrequently, they had been kicked out of hospitals because they "used" and out of treatment facilities because they were "psychotic." This was only one problem. The real problem was the inclination of the afflicted to spend years doing drugs and alcohol. So much so it became their only real goal.

As a consequence their social functioning dropped to virtually nil and they failed at placements since they did not pay their rent, keep the place up or just simply went drifting off.

Before the 1960s this problem was handled by civil commitment. People who could not care for themselves or were incapable or unwilling to cease self-destructive alcohol or drug use were committed to institutions.

Then we had a revolution where commitment became difficult and hospitals were closed because they allegedly relied on enforced hospitalizations. The consequence was and is all of these people are on the streets.

Supervised living situations or support help but they will eventually prove unworkable for a significant portion of these individuals. Apparently in the guise of giving the seriously impaired "their rights" they are being left to die with their "rights on."

Without a way to ensure that people remain off substances and on necessary medications for long periods of time well meaning efforts will fail.

In the meantime, spending more and more may help at the margins but the basic issue is when is a person allowed to chose or decline treatment when they are mentally impaired?

Libertarians and liberals answer in the negative. That is never should a person be forced into treatment. This in spite of good data showing the outcome for alcohol treatment is quite good early when civil commitment is required. Ditto for the other major disorders.
3 posted on 01/18/2007 6:06:16 PM PST by shrinkermd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd
Libertarians and liberals answer in the negative. That is never should a person be forced into treatment. This in spite of good data showing the outcome for alcohol treatment is quite good early when civil commitment is required. Ditto for the other major disorders.

I agree with you completely on this.

If I wasn't pushed into a crack rehab program by a judge threatening me with the alternative of prison I don't know if I ever would have recovered. Period.

And I was a straight A student who graduated first in my college class with a perfect 4.0 GPA.

I NEEDED that incentive from the court requiring my committment.....and years later I thank God for it. And for that judge.

I have my life back now as a result.

4 posted on 01/18/2007 6:16:14 PM PST by Jorge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd; Coleus

Pro-life bump.


5 posted on 01/18/2007 6:17:30 PM PST by Salvation (†With God all things are possible.†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jorge

I donate money to homeless shelters here in Philly regularly
___________________________________________________________

My wife does a lot for our local Rescue Mission. One of the best things about it is they hold their clients accountable.

With God's grace some of them learn to hold themselves accountable.


6 posted on 01/18/2007 6:25:43 PM PST by Grizzled Bear ("Does not play well with others.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd

I'm sorry, but I think part of the problem is calling vagrant drug addicts and winos homeless, an appellation created to garner sympathy for the plight of people who have chosen, in the face of myriad social services and expenditure, to live the life they are living.

You get more of what you subsidize and less of what you discourage, and the population of bums proves it.


7 posted on 01/18/2007 6:55:21 PM PST by gcruse (http://garycruse.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Grizzled Bear; Jorge

God bless all those who minister to the homeless....I am seeing so many young homeless people around now. It is very heartbreaking. Jorge - your post is hope for many who seem hopeless. I hope and pray others "out there" have someone who comes along and give that motivation that so many no longer have to get help and get well.


8 posted on 01/18/2007 6:55:56 PM PST by Freedom'sWorthIt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Grizzled Bear
My wife does a lot for our local Rescue Mission. One of the best things about it is they hold their clients accountable. With God's grace some of them learn to hold themselves accountable.

Excellent.

I try to donate to Christian based missions that give people a vision of hope that includes personal responsibility and reliance on God that supercedes the cirumstances in this present world.

I think all of us need that type of hope...but especially those who are alone on the streets.

9 posted on 01/18/2007 7:13:19 PM PST by Jorge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: gcruse

There, but for the Grace of God go YOU.

Many of these people are so ill, both emotionally and sometimes physically, that they have no alternatives.

Compassion is not inconsistent with conservative values.


10 posted on 01/18/2007 7:14:37 PM PST by EEDUDE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Jorge

I agree with your post. It is terribly sad. How good of you to donate your money!


11 posted on 01/18/2007 7:16:53 PM PST by TAdams8591
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: EEDUDE

"There, but for the Grace of God go YOU. "

Nope.


12 posted on 01/18/2007 7:18:58 PM PST by gcruse (http://garycruse.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Freedom'sWorthIt
God bless all those who minister to the homeless....I am seeing so many young homeless people around now.

Actually I can sympathize because I lived on the streets when I was 16 years old, for almost a year.

For me, to see someone sleeping on a grate in Philly, knowing this is someone's child, brother or sister...and see where they have ended up, is beyond words.

13 posted on 01/18/2007 7:23:08 PM PST by Jorge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: gcruse; EEDUDE
"There, but for the Grace of God go YOU. "

Nope.

YES YOU.

Please don't tempt God with such ignorant responses.

For your own sake.

You don't know what could happen to you tomorrow.

14 posted on 01/18/2007 7:27:22 PM PST by Jorge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd
Before the 1960s this problem was handled by civil commitment. People who could not care for themselves or were incapable or unwilling to cease self-destructive alcohol or drug use were committed to institutions. Then we had a revolution where commitment became difficult and hospitals were closed because they allegedly relied on enforced hospitalizations. The consequence was and is all of these people are on the streets.

Excellent post (#3 in its entirety) and thread, I hope many will read it and give it some thought.

15 posted on 01/18/2007 7:30:46 PM PST by Diddle E. Squat (An easy 10-team playoff based on the BCS bowls can be implemented by next year. See my homepage.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd
For unclear reasons, resection was made con­tingent upon cessation of drug use and was not done.

Unclear to whom? Lifelong drug addicts who refuse to quit until they are physically unable to go out and get the stuff do not deserve one cent of medical care at the expense of taxpayers.

While I agree with you that involuntary commitment is what's needed in many cases, even that shouldn't be allowed to become a huge drain on taxpayers. Few people with an inclination to live this way will ever become productive citizens, and the current maze of regulations and laws wildly inflate the expense of running of inpatient mental institutions, and prohibit requiring the patients to perform valuable work to support the operation of the institution. The money would be better spent on higher quality care for people who really have no ability to help themselves, even under confinement and pressure (severely retarded, brain-damaged, Alzheimer's patients, etc.).

16 posted on 01/18/2007 8:30:02 PM PST by GovernmentShrinker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gcruse

part of the problem is calling vagrant drug addicts and winos homeless
__________________________________________________________

Kinda like calling people who consider flipping burgers (only one example) "beneath their dignity" unemployed?


17 posted on 01/18/2007 8:56:16 PM PST by Grizzled Bear ("Does not play well with others.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Grizzled Bear

Kinda like calling an IQ of 50 'differently abled.'


18 posted on 01/18/2007 9:00:55 PM PST by gcruse (http://garycruse.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Jorge

Exactly. I wouldn't be so cocky as to make such a statement.
I'll bet 90% of homeless people never would have imagined it happening to them.


19 posted on 01/18/2007 9:10:14 PM PST by derllak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: derllak
Exactly. I wouldn't be so cocky as to make such a statement.
I'll bet 90% of homeless people never would have imagined it happening to them.
___________________________________________________________

I do sympathize because sometimes bad things happen. I can even sympathize when people make bad choices.

I run out of sympathy when people refuse to take responsibility for themselves (except for those who are incapable, of course).
20 posted on 01/18/2007 9:14:54 PM PST by Grizzled Bear ("Does not play well with others.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson