To: Antoninus
It's up to the Party to give the people a reason to come out and vote FOR them--aside from "Boo! The Democrats!" That ought to be enough - if you don't think so then you have no right to complain about what the democrats do (which will be to destroy our nation).
Anyone who had a hand in allowing the dems to take control and do that is to blame - using the excuse that the GOP is not far enough right is not a valid reason to hand the fate of the country over to the treasonous democrats.
Which would you rather have - someone in power who agrees with 60% of what you believe in or someone in power who agrees with 5% of what you believe in?
59 posted on
01/19/2007 11:10:36 AM PST by
Tokra
(I think I'll retire to Bedlam.)
To: Tokra
Which would you rather have - someone in power who agrees with 60% of what you believe in or someone in power who agrees with 5% of what you believe in?
With G. W. Bush, we did indeed have a case where I agreed with about 60% of what he stood for. I was happy to work for him, send him $$, and vote for him. With Rudy McRomney, I'm looking at about 20% tops.
Plus, two out of the three are pro-baby-killing and all three are pro-pretend-marriage. Those are litmus test issues that I won't turn my back on under any circumstances.
60 posted on
01/19/2007 11:21:10 AM PST by
Antoninus
( Rudy McRomney as the GOP nominee = President Hillary. Why else do you think the media loves them?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson