Skip to comments.
Romney vs. Romney (are you sure this guy is a Republican?)
Boston Globe ^
| 19 Jan. 2007
| Scot Lehigh
Posted on 01/19/2007 8:39:00 AM PST by RKV
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140 ... 181-190 next last
To: RKV
Y'all got it wrong. The question is "Is this guy a conservative?" Then answer, obviously, is "NO."
Of course the Republibots will be along shortly to tell us that we should vote for any candidate the GOP puts in front us, we're never going to find a perfect candidate, conservatives can't win, yadayadayada...
I'll agree we'll never find a perfect candidate, but couldn't we at least find a decent one?
To: CommerceComet
""Why is the Globe so intent on attacking Romney?"
Perhaps because Romney is the only Republican candidate from Massachusetts. After all, it is the Boston Globe. Frankly, I don't think the national Democrats are particularly afraid of Mitt Romney."
Then why have they published 11 press releases in the last 6 weeks, where Romney was the headline? More then all the other candidates combined (although, McCain has about that many that mention him somewhere in the press release).
To: LtdGovt
Amen.
Far to many Freepers are engaging in promoting mute negative issues, just for the sake of argument.
103
posted on
01/19/2007 10:54:02 AM PST
by
duckln
To: wku man
Supporting the so-called "assault weapons" ban makes him a RINO. Period. He'll never get a vote from me.
You didn't vote for Bush either?
104
posted on
01/19/2007 10:58:43 AM PST
by
LtdGovt
("Where government moves in, community retreats and civil society disintegrates" -Janice Rogers Brown)
To: Little Ray
I'll agree we'll never find a perfect candidate, but couldn't we at least find a decent one?You see, the threshhold for being an "unappeasable" keeps lowering.
It used to be about 90 percent - you would be called such if you demanded a candidate fit your views 9 out of ten times.
Now it's down somewhere in the 20-30 percent range, from what I have seen, and getting lower each passing week. Now we are supposed to overlook someone being pro-choice, pro-gun-control and pro-amnesty. We are supposed to vote for a certain guy because he supports the WOT - even though every candidate except for one (Ron Paul) supports the WOT. And if we question the motives of a candidate who is suddenly shifting to the right on these issues after years of taking a more leftward position, well, we're bashers.
After all, their guy is the only one who can win, even though we are a year away from the first primary.
105
posted on
01/19/2007 10:58:46 AM PST
by
dirtboy
(Duncan Hunter - a candidate who doesn't need infomercials to convince you he's a conservative)
To: Little Ray
Would you not agree that ANY Republican would be better than Hillary, Obama, Edwards, Dodd, Biden, Richardson, etc.?
Do you really want Pelosi and Reid to remain as majority leaders merrily undoing all that HAS been accomplished, raising taxes, undermining our troops, requiring pro-life taxpayers to pay for what they abhor?
106
posted on
01/19/2007 10:59:20 AM PST
by
Carolinamom
(To oppose everything while proposing nothing is irresponsible. -- President Bush)
To: LtdGovt
I wish people would reserve judgement until more is known about the platform these candidates are running onYeah, why bother paying attention to their past stated beliefs on key conservative issues? After all, politicians NEVER pander to get votes.
107
posted on
01/19/2007 11:00:11 AM PST
by
dirtboy
(Duncan Hunter - a candidate who doesn't need infomercials to convince you he's a conservative)
To: Obilisk18
""Why is the Globe so intent on attacking Romney?" Because if nominated, Mitt could drag Massachusetts into the GOP column.
108
posted on
01/19/2007 11:00:23 AM PST
by
duckln
To: sitetest
Dear sitetest,
You leave out 70% of the other issues. The war on terror, entitlement spending, taxes, government regulation. If you include those, you will see that 70% is guaranteed.
Furthermore, politicians usually hold themselves to the position they espoused most recently. For example, Bush senior used to be pro-choice, but when he ran in 1988, he ran as a pro-lifer. Then, as president, he vetoed bills that (allegedly) promoted abortion. So your skepticism is unwarranted, in my opinion.
109
posted on
01/19/2007 11:02:28 AM PST
by
LtdGovt
("Where government moves in, community retreats and civil society disintegrates" -Janice Rogers Brown)
To: duckln
Because if nominated, Mitt could drag Massachusetts into the GOP column. Uhh, I'm a Mitt supporter, but the chances of Mitt carrying Massachusetts in a nationwide campaign are roughly the same as Dunken Hunter carrying California.
To: LtdGovt
Dear LtdGovt,
"You leave out 70% of the other issues. The war on terror, entitlement spending, taxes, government regulation. If you include those, you will see that 70% is guaranteed."
I doubt it.
But it wouldn't matter.
He scores close to 0% on the issues that are paramount to me.
"For example, Bush senior used to be pro-choice, but when he ran in 1988, he ran as a pro-lifer."
Mr. Bush "converted" in 1980, and spoke as and showed himself a consistent pro-lifer, working side-by-side with President Reagan for eight years by 1988.
Let Mr. Romney speak as and show himself a consistent pro-lifer for eight years, and then get back to me. That would make him eligible in time for the 2012 election, or thereabouts.
sitetest
111
posted on
01/19/2007 11:11:44 AM PST
by
sitetest
(If Roe is not overturned, no unborn child will ever be protected in law.)
To: dirtboy
Now it's down somewhere in the 20-30 percent range
Please tell me in what 70-80 percent of the time you disagree with Romney. That is, name the specific issues.
The truth of the matter is, the GOP needs a good spokesperson and a strong candidate in 2008, to lead the party to victory, against all odds. A member of the House of Representatives isn't going to do it, unfortunately.
112
posted on
01/19/2007 11:14:06 AM PST
by
LtdGovt
("Where government moves in, community retreats and civil society disintegrates" -Janice Rogers Brown)
To: RKV
Massachusetts voters think he is a liberal or they would not vote for him..
Massachusetts voters are to the left of New York City voters..
Mitt Romney is a liberal.. meaning moron.. slightly smarter than Al Gore..
113
posted on
01/19/2007 11:16:08 AM PST
by
hosepipe
(CAUTION: This propaganda is laced with hyperbole....)
To: sitetest
He scores close to 0% on the issues that are paramount to me.
And what issues are paramount to you? Abortion, and what else? Isn't the War on Terror an important issue for you?
Mr. Bush "converted" in 1980, and spoke as and showed himself a consistent pro-lifer, working side-by-side with President Reagan for eight years by 1988.
I don't believe his consersion, quite frankly (and neither do I Romney's, but he might have been pro-life from the beginning). But my point was: Romney isn't going to stab you in the back. If he is truly as slick as anti-Romney people would make me believe, surely, he is not going to sacrifice his re-election, just to make sitetest angry.
114
posted on
01/19/2007 11:17:16 AM PST
by
LtdGovt
("Where government moves in, community retreats and civil society disintegrates" -Janice Rogers Brown)
To: LtdGovt
Please tell me in what 70-80 percent of the time you disagree with Romney. That is, name the specific issues.Abortion and gun control are the biggies. Those are HUGE issues for the right. And I'm also not convinced about the sincerity of his position regarding amnesty.
Of the three allegeded front-runners, I find him the least objectionable. However, I also think we can do a heck of a lot better.
115
posted on
01/19/2007 11:18:56 AM PST
by
dirtboy
(Duncan Hunter - a candidate who doesn't need infomercials to convince you he's a conservative)
To: EternalVigilance
The leftwing of FR throwing dirt in the air to try to cover for a liberal... Them are fightin' words EV. Romney supporters are plenty conservative. Ann Coulter supports Romney, is she insufficiently conservative? Just because we don't wish to support the Republican equivalent of Dennis Kucinich doesn't make us lefties.
To: LtdGovt
Isn't the War on Terror an important issue for you?Every declared GOP candidate except for Ron Paul supports the WOT. So in the primaries, that really isn't a factor.
117
posted on
01/19/2007 11:21:22 AM PST
by
dirtboy
(Duncan Hunter - a candidate who doesn't need infomercials to convince you he's a conservative)
To: dirtboy
Abortion and gun control are the biggies. Those are HUGE issues for the right. And I'm also not convinced about the sincerity of his position regarding amnesty.
So it's more a lack of trust, than any specific objection. No matter what he says, I doubt that you will believe him.
Of the three allegeded front-runners, I find him the least objectionable. However, I also think we can do a heck of a lot better.
In the primary, yes. In the general election, no. Don't forget the mood swing that just handed the Democrats the House AND the Senate. Someone like Duncan Hunter would be slaughtered in the general election.
118
posted on
01/19/2007 11:24:08 AM PST
by
LtdGovt
("Where government moves in, community retreats and civil society disintegrates" -Janice Rogers Brown)
To: dirtboy
Every declared GOP candidate except for Ron Paul supports the WOT. So in the primaries, that really isn't a factor.
But what will come of the War on Terror if the GOP nominates a sure loser? That's what I'm worried about.
119
posted on
01/19/2007 11:25:24 AM PST
by
LtdGovt
("Where government moves in, community retreats and civil society disintegrates" -Janice Rogers Brown)
To: LtdGovt
So it's more a lack of trust, than any specific objection. No matter what he says, I doubt that you will believe him.I tend to question conservative epiphanies when they are concurrent with a candidate seeking a new office. I know you consider that silly, so apparently what used to be common sense is now viewed as some form of madness.
In the primary, yes. In the general election, no. Don't forget the mood swing that just handed the Democrats the House AND the Senate. Someone like Duncan Hunter would be slaughtered in the general election.
First of all, the main reason the GOP lost in 2006 is because they quit acting like Republicans. And second, the Rockefeller wing of the party cannot win at the national level any longer - the only reason Bush the Elder won in 1998 was Reagan's legacy, and he lost after he drifted from such.
So I find it rather silly that you would think an east-coast pro-choice moderate is the best candidate to win in 2008, when past history screams the opposite (more of that common-sense insanity that apparently has completely inhibited my ability to grasp your political wisdom).
120
posted on
01/19/2007 11:30:44 AM PST
by
dirtboy
(Duncan Hunter - a candidate who doesn't need infomercials to convince you he's a conservative)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140 ... 181-190 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson