Good grief people, let's do what we always tell others to do: don't listen to the rhetoric, he was trying to get elected in the most liberal state in the nation, listen to the record.
And his record as Governor is very, very good.
Unfortunately, I have been burned by your kind of illogic before - namely Arnold Schwarzenegger. Not again. Better to be in opposition, than co-opted on critical issues. The RATs want us to go along, when we should be very clear with the American people, that we don't agree. And explain why we're not playing their game.
Let's see. During his tenure, gay marriage has been instituted, on the strength of his executive power. He ordered the justices of the peace to perform gay "marriage" "ceremonies." If they refused to do them, they would be fired.
He also instituted mandatory health insurance, aka socialized medicine, paid for by MA companies, whether they like it or not.
His executive power has been used to heavily push the gay agenda, and he's appointed radical gay activists to the bench.
There's lots more.
If that is how you would define a "very, very good record" I'd hate to see what you would refer to as "a bad record."
"o: don't listen to the rhetoric, he was trying to get elected in the most liberal state in the nation, listen to the record.
"
So you are saying Mitt will say anything to get elected. How do we know his sentiments are any more genuine this time and aren't just being made out of naked ambition?