Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 01/19/2007 10:06:10 AM PST by NormsRevenge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: NormsRevenge

Bush made a mistake by not tapping Steele. It would have appeased alot of pissed off Republicans. Instead he went and pissed us off more by naming Mel.


2 posted on 01/19/2007 10:09:45 AM PST by CollegeRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge
Damn. This is the kind of person I would want in that position.


6 posted on 01/19/2007 10:13:46 AM PST by darkwing104 (Let's get dangerous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge
But, no, he emphasized, “we never had an offer” from anyone in the Bush White House.

For me, evidence is piling up that the problems at the RNC begin and end with the White House. At some point, we're going to have to stop pulling our punches...
7 posted on 01/19/2007 10:17:17 AM PST by Antoninus ( Rudy McRomney as the GOP nominee = President Hillary. Why else do you think the media loves them?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge

Steele would have been an excellent choice. Martinez is my Senator and boy am I already disappointed in his sorry amnesty butt.


8 posted on 01/19/2007 10:19:13 AM PST by Joe Boucher (an enemy of islam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge

Steele needs to be elected to SOMETHING. Senate, President, Congress, whatever!


9 posted on 01/19/2007 10:20:22 AM PST by RockinRight (To compare Congress to drunken sailors is an insult to drunken sailors. - Ronald W. Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge

Mel Martinez is a jerk. But he managed to get himself elected, and for whatever reason Steele did not.

It was very disappointing. But if blacks cannot be persuaded to help elect one of their own, It's hard to know what to do about it.


12 posted on 01/19/2007 10:31:25 AM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge
Steele said that he and the President talked after his defeat in November, that Mr. Bush “expressed his confidence in me.”

That's nice, but it's just talk. There aren't too many things out there with a shorter shelf-life than a defeated candidate. It's clear this WH doesn't have any interest in Mr. Steele. He'd be better off fending for himself, whether that's in private business or seeking backing elsewhere for elective office.

BTW, it's probably a plus that he's not tapped (trapped?) for serving in the Cabinet. That's likely a dead-end job at this point, treading water for another 18 months in an outgoing Administration that is facing a hostile Congress. Not enough time to get much of anything positive done for a new Cabinet officer who has ambitions for elective office.

14 posted on 01/19/2007 10:39:06 AM PST by chimera
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge

The simple fact is Steele is a conservative, and Bush isn't. I think Steel would have been an excellent choice, a natural. Still, he and Bush aren't on the same page.


17 posted on 01/19/2007 10:48:04 AM PST by stevem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge

I like M Steele very much as a candidate in 08 for US Prez


20 posted on 01/19/2007 12:29:56 PM PST by buffyt (It is not a CHOICE ~ It is a CHILD!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge

This week James Lileks described the RNC as "bunkered, hunkered, and clueless." With our current party leadership they will remain that way. A party that cannot make good use of someone with Steele's talent is, well, stupid.


29 posted on 01/19/2007 7:06:40 PM PST by TChad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge

There are insiders and outsiders. Steele would never have been seriously considered.


37 posted on 01/22/2007 5:37:15 AM PST by Mr. Jeeves ("When the government is invasive, the people are wanting." -- Tao Te Ching)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson