Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

An Historical Perspective on a Muslim Being Sworn into Congress on the Koran
Wallbuilders.com ^ | January, 2007 | David Barton

Posted on 01/19/2007 6:35:59 PM PST by cf_river_rat

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-51 next last
This is a great article full of historical facts with contemporary relevance. It is long, though, and it's in PDF format.
1 posted on 01/19/2007 6:36:01 PM PST by cf_river_rat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: cf_river_rat

How come we never heard about Mitt Romney demanding to be sworn in on "The Book of Mormon" ???

/sarc


2 posted on 01/19/2007 6:41:39 PM PST by xcamel (Press to Test, Release to Detonate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cf_river_rat

I thought Hussein Obama was the first Muslim elected to congress.


3 posted on 01/19/2007 6:44:15 PM PST by NavVet (O)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cf_river_rat
The first Muslim Member of Congress was John Randolph of Virginia, who
served in Congress from 1799-1834. Significantly, Francis Scott
Key, author of the “Star Spangled Banner,” befriended Randolph and
faithfully shared Christ with him. Randolph eventually converted from
Islam to Christianity and became a strong personal advocate for
his newfound faith. (Key also shared Christianity with other Muslims,
and even bought them copies of the Christian Bible printed in Arabic.)


I have listened to Barton/Wallbuilders many times.
I've generally been very receptive to his commentary.

But this is so incredible, that if it is really true...I'll
probably just take the old American History books I've saved from
my high school years (if I can locate them in the attic or basement, LOL!)...
and either throw them in the trash...or staple in a copy of this
Barton/Wallbuilder column.

Good Heavens, the things even the good-hearted history teachers
(G-d rest the memory of Mrs. Wong) I had didn't know or left out
of their lectures...
4 posted on 01/19/2007 6:47:12 PM PST by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cf_river_rat

bump for publicity


5 posted on 01/19/2007 6:48:15 PM PST by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cf_river_rat

Fascinating, thank you.


6 posted on 01/19/2007 6:51:42 PM PST by Velveeta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cf_river_rat

Ellison may not be the first Muslim in Congress but I hope he's the last. Ellison seems to be a true believer. A devout Muslim's loyalty is first, last and always to the Islamic Nation. At least we know that Ellison won't be involved with any pork barrel spending.


7 posted on 01/19/2007 6:58:04 PM PST by Free ThinkerNY ((((Truth shall set you free))))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

This guy is a member of "The Nation of Islam" which simply is not considered to be a truly Islamic organization.


8 posted on 01/19/2007 7:03:18 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: NavVet

He claims to be an American and Christianity is his faith.


9 posted on 01/19/2007 7:04:22 PM PST by Paige ("Guard against the impostures of pretended patriotism." --George Washington)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY
Interesting point. I wonder if he demands the term "pork barrel spending" be banned from use? After all, all things pork is offensive to Muslims.

I also wonder how long it will be before He has a prayer room installed in the senate,' has the call to prayer blaring over the intercom system, and the senate take prayer breaks to allow Muzzie senators their prayer breaks?

How long before a sharia law bill is introduced? (although that will probably happen in Muslim saturated states without his help)
10 posted on 01/19/2007 7:07:31 PM PST by Nathan Zachary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: cf_river_rat
I am not finding this else where.

Is there a second source for this?

11 posted on 01/19/2007 7:14:23 PM PST by Harmless Teddy Bear (We must have faith For when it is all said and done, Faith manages. And the impossible is achieved)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Harmless Teddy Bear

Hugh A. Garland, The Life of John Randolph of Roanoke (New York: D. Appleton & Co., 1853), Vol. II, p. 102, to Dr. Brockenbrough, September 25, 1818.

Garland, Life of John Randolph, pp. 87-88, in a letter from Francis Scott Key, May-June 1816; pp. 99-100, Randolph’s letter to Francis Scott Key, September 7, 1818; pp. 103-104, Key’s letter to Randolph; 106-107, Key’s reply to Randolph’s letter of May 3, 1819; and pp. 108-109, Key’s reply to Randolph’s letter of August 8, 1819.


12 posted on 01/19/2007 7:28:56 PM PST by cf_river_rat (Just another defender of the faith)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: cf_river_rat

I have heard of John Randolph of Roanoke. He was a conservative gentleman, and I believe was descended from Pocahantas.

The idea that he was a Muslim is new to me, however, and seems hard to believe. Why would a native born American have been a Muslim?

The article goes on to say, some of the African slaves brought to America were Muslims, although that, too is not something I have really seen anything on, either. I've always heard them referred to as animists. The slave merchants were Muslims, but did they sell people of their own faith? Up to ten percent of the blacks they sold? That seems odd, too.

Does anyone know anything more about this? About Randolph or about Muslim slaves? Can these claims be confirmed?

The Black Muslim movement was relatively recent, and has no connections that I know of to earlier black experience in America. Most slaves by the time of the Emancipation were Christians, I believe. Black Muslims argued that Christianity was the religion of the slave masters, imposed upon blacks--but without realizing that slavery originated with Arab slave masters.


13 posted on 01/19/2007 7:32:32 PM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cf_river_rat
Thank you. I could find a bio of John Randolph but it said that he was an atheist (or rather a skeptic) in his youth but it said nothing about him being a Muslim. With this new information I have a digging spot.

It is always amazing how much is left out of the history books.

14 posted on 01/19/2007 7:32:54 PM PST by Harmless Teddy Bear (We must have faith For when it is all said and done, Faith manages. And the impossible is achieved)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

"This guy is a member of "The Nation of Islam" which simply is not considered to be a truly Islamic organization."





Which authorities have decided that, and why do they continue to be counted as Muslim, in population reference sources.


15 posted on 01/19/2007 7:39:27 PM PST by ansel12 (America, love it ,or at least give up your home citizenship before accepting ours too.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: cf_river_rat

I can't find a text of Garland on the internet, but I did find this:

http://www.1911encyclopedia.org/John_Randolph

This is the 1911 Encyclopedia Brittanica, which is famed as being more accurate than the later editions. It says, at the bottom of the first page:

"The best biography is that by Henry Adams, John Randolph (Boston, 1882), in the "American Statesmen Series." There is also a biography, which, however, contains many inaccuracies, by Hugh A. Garland (2 vols., New York, 1851)."

So, I don't think I would credit either of these statements, about Muslim slaves or about John Randolph, without some further evidence.


16 posted on 01/19/2007 7:40:11 PM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Harmless Teddy Bear

But see my posts 13 and 16. I think we need some confirming evidence before getting too excited about this.


17 posted on 01/19/2007 7:42:33 PM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: ansel12
Which authorities have decided that

The Orthodox Muslims.

and why do they continue to be counted as Muslim, in population reference sources.

For the same reason that Mormons are counted as Christians when most Orthodox Christians do not consider them so. It is how they consider themselves that counts in that case.

One is a civil label that is self awarded and one is a religious label that depends on the majority of the religious group you are claiming to belong to accepting that claim.

18 posted on 01/19/2007 7:44:45 PM PST by Harmless Teddy Bear (We must have faith For when it is all said and done, Faith manages. And the impossible is achieved)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Cicero

I have been unable to find any information about John Randolph being a Muslim. He was renowned as an eccentric, so it wouldn't have been overly shocking.


19 posted on 01/19/2007 7:45:15 PM PST by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Harmless Teddy Bear

"The Orthodox Muslims."




Is that an organization, who are they?


20 posted on 01/19/2007 7:47:12 PM PST by ansel12 (America, love it ,or at least give up your home citizenship before accepting ours too.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-51 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson