The Next Attack at Home

Very well said. As of this writing, a majority of Americans are not prepared to hear the truth about what our enemies have in store for us. They do not wish to be discomfited with painful words or uncomfortable realities, but desire a return to the soft cocoon of illusions the Democrats have woven for them. God will help us, but first we must help ourselves. Keep preaching, and perhaps more will listen.

The radical extremist islamic fascists also have to overcome regular Sunni and regular Shia and whatever the flavor is in Indonesia and in Phillipines and whatever is found wherever. They won't win, although they might continue tilting windmills forever.

I may get flamed for this.. But what the heck, I'm going to say it anyway.

If the next attack does come here, I hope to God it's sooner than later.

The Faster we get a serious wounding, the faster this country will get rid of the maggots and start listening to the Warriors.

Until then, I fear the nay saying nanny staters will leave us even more exposed than we are now.

and no I don't wish anyone dead, but in light of things.. sooner is better than later.

We need strong appeals to courage and patriotism. Enemies need to labelled as such and called out as such. Cowardice needs to be mocked and heckled, not courage. The idea of dying for your country needs to be proclaimed proudly, loudly, often, so as to show the retreaters for the cowards they are...not the heroes they fantasize themselves to be.

I agree with you that it WILL take another attack. The liberals surrounding me talk about "peace" and how George Bush is worse than the terrorists. I try to bend my mind into Moebius strips to understand their thought processes.

The closest I've been able to come is that they think nothing is worth dying for, and Bush has asked our troops to die fighting the War on Terror (Islamic Fascism). Yet the libs can't play out the chess game of their ideal. Nothing is worth dying for? Would you die to push your little child to safety from an oncoming train? Yes, the liberal daddy would. Would you die to save your grandchildren from a burning house? Liberal grandpas would. But would you die to save your neighbor's grandchildren? I suppose they would not.

The truth is, that matches what they believe fiscally. Liberals who make or contribute to policy are rich. They vote or push for small mosquito-bite sacrifices to "help" the poor (and leave the poor subservient and voting for them like trained rats pushing the food lever). The rich liberals know that these policies mean that the middle class, working hardest but barely scraping by, will be hit with huge financial shark bites to support the often undeserving poor. Such a cruel way of thinking can be hidden from the public simply by holding the hand up in a peace sign.

"Would you die to push your little child to safety from an oncoming train? Yes, the liberal daddy would. Would you die to save your grandchildren from a burning house?"

You may be giving the me-me-me'ers w-a-a-a-y too much credit. We have a country conditioned to think that murdering their own children is a woman's "choice," and anything 1/2" short of infanticide is ok for convenience.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.