Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 01/21/2007 8:20:28 AM PST by governsleastgovernsbest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Behind Liberal Lines; Miss Marple; an amused spectator; netmilsmom; Diogenesis; YaYa123; MEG33; ...

Do-Dems-Want-Us-to-Win? ping to Today show list.


2 posted on 01/21/2007 8:21:38 AM PST by governsleastgovernsbest (Watching the Today Show since 2002 so you don't have to.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

Retreat equals victory in '08. That's all that counts to liberals. They count our war dead with crocodile tears as they add the voter multiple to each one. These are vile, wicked and small people. They deserve to be crushed.


3 posted on 01/21/2007 8:27:33 AM PST by TADSLOS (Iran is in the IED exporting business. Time to shut them down.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

Brit Hume is an American Treasure. His remarks on why people do not like Hillary were terrific also.


4 posted on 01/21/2007 8:28:17 AM PST by Pharmboy ([She turned me into a] Newt! in '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

Well, that's a pretty good summary, if somewhat selective. The point that I was astounded by, however, was Kristol saying, "a war we are losing."


5 posted on 01/21/2007 8:29:43 AM PST by jammer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
The dems don't care one way or the other about Iraq. They want Bush to fail. If failure in Iraq advances that agenda, they want failure in Iraq. Provided, of course, that failure is seen as Bush's fault.

The problem with the U.S. defeat in Vietnam, in their view, was that the public perception very quickly boomeranged against the left. So the dems now want to engineer failure without having their fingerprints on it. They want Bush to cut and run to save themselves from having to go on the record on binding legislation.

This is what happens when a political party has no agenda higher than partisanship.

6 posted on 01/21/2007 8:30:29 AM PST by sphinx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

Really Bill, when did you discover this? Yesterday? Last week?

Typical of an insider media elitist, Kristol is at least 3 years late in expressing this observation.

The Beltway "experts" lag FR yet again.


7 posted on 01/21/2007 8:32:46 AM PST by EyeGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
Kristol would have far more credibility had he not aligned himself with a buffoon like Fred Barnes. Barnes even looks like a buffoon.
8 posted on 01/21/2007 8:32:50 AM PST by BW2221
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

Juan debating Kristol and Hume on politics is like me debating Richard Feynman and Albert Einstein on physics.


9 posted on 01/21/2007 8:33:26 AM PST by magellan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
I liked the comment he had about a new commander in Iraq. It basically was, the dems have been crying about the existing mission and plan is a failed policy. Now they are saying since Bush replaced a commander who said we don't need more troops, he is not taking the advice of the "boots on the ground". Kristol said, with some sarcasm, Bush replaced that commander BECAUSE he is trying a new tact. It is further PROOF that it does not matter what Bush does, the Dems will not approve. Just look at the reversal of many Dems when 6 months ago they were calling for more troops. Now they don't.
11 posted on 01/21/2007 8:44:27 AM PST by hophead ("A questions not really a question, if you know the answer too.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

To hell with Krostol. This isiot played his staring role in slamming the GOP for the past year. He is one in a long list that convinced some voters to stay home or cross party lines and vote donk. THis dumbass should have thought about the implications of his words because he assisted Pelosi to the gavel, thus steering Congress when we at war against the most dangerous enemy we have ever faced! I will never trust the whiney pathetic Kristol again. He is a punk of the highest order.


12 posted on 01/21/2007 8:45:49 AM PST by jrooney ( Hold your cards close.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
re: as if people don't feel they have been misled down this path

Even if I were to choose to disregard FreeRep's policies on abuse, attacks, bad language, name calling, etc. I could never find the words to express how tired I am of hearing the BS about someone "misleading" someone!

If anyone was misled it was President Bush and the fine military forces of the US. And the ones doing the misleading were the Dems and the Left wing! They are the ones who agreed we had to do something about Iraq and when given the choices voted, with a few exceptions, to give the President the say-so in what would be done and how it would be done. Excuse me, it wasn't the President who agreed to something and then moved to jerk the rug out from under our cause!!

The misleading in all of this was the people who stood to be counted as for the operation, but apparantly never intended to stand behind their vote!

Misleading is when you tell someone you are on their side and will back them when the chips are down and then after they've made plans and commitments based on your assurances back out. Misleading saying one thing, knowing full well you plan to do something else.

Yes, there was misleading all right, loads of it. But it comes from the very people who have the audacity to stand up now and tell us they were "mislead."

This whole thing just shows me once more how dangerous it is to take the word of someone, person or party, who has stabbed you in the back before. Remember the "no new taxes" debacle.

It is not a case of misleading when you do what you say you are going to do, based on an accepted set of circumstances at the time, and it turns out other than you had said it would.

Misleading is telling someone you're on their side, then doing everything in your power to make sure they don't succeed, all the while whining about being misled.

Argh....
13 posted on 01/21/2007 8:47:34 AM PST by jwparkerjr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

This is a rhetorical question right?

Of course they don't want "it" to work. That would fly in the face of every criticism of the hated Bush, the Republicans, the hated "right wing Christian hate-mongers" and put Iraqis on the path to sustaining freedom and joining the modern world. No democrat wants that outside Zell Miller and Joe Lieberman.


14 posted on 01/21/2007 8:52:03 AM PST by subterfuge (Today, Tolerance =greatest virtue;Hypocrisy=worst character defect; Discrimination =worst atrocity)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
Is it any wonder that the Left hates FOX NEWS when it's new anchors, like Hume and Kristol, are so brutally honest about the Democrats? This is a fine example of why FOX NEWS is indispensable, honest, iconoclastic, accurate, and absolutely necessary in today's world. When was the last time you heard anyone in the MSM state the blatantly obvious that much of the Democratic Party is cheering for our enemies and jeering the Commander in Chief and the military?
20 posted on 01/21/2007 9:15:29 AM PST by elhombrelibre (After 9/11, Bush went to war with terrorists and their supporters. Democrats war against him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
Kristol: "People are being too complacent or forgiving to the Democrats: 'Oh, it's politics; one of them has a non-binding resolution and another one has a cap.' It's all totally irresponsible. It's just unbelievable. The president is sending over a new commander, he's sending over troops, and the Democratic congress, either in a pseudo-binding way or a non-binding way is saying: 'it won't work -- forget it! You troops, you're going over there on a pointless missions. You Iraqis who might side with us, forget it, we're going to pull the plug." It's so irresponsible . . . You really wonder: do they want it to work or not? I really wonder that. . . Do they want this to succeed or not?"

Bill, what's there to wonder about? Take them at their word: THEY DON'T!!!!

They have fought the President just about every step of the way since 9/11, on Afghanistan, on Guantanamo, on actions taken domestically to stop further attacks, and on Iraq. I no longer pay attention to their constant carping. It's just a shame that many Americans still do. To hell with them and to hell with any patriot or Republican that stands with these treasonous poisonous politicians who see their own political future as over-riding any other concern.

21 posted on 01/21/2007 9:15:56 AM PST by Rummyfan (Iraq: it's not about Iraq anymore, it's about the USA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
There has been tremendous support for this president and for this war effort, and it has come to naught and it has come to a bad place."

WHAT????!!! Juan is an ass! Way to go Britt in responding to his nonsense.

22 posted on 01/21/2007 9:18:03 AM PST by Rummyfan (Iraq: it's not about Iraq anymore, it's about the USA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
You really wonder: do they want it to work or not? I really wonder that. . . Do they want this to succeed or not?"

The Democrats don't exist in a vacuum. Far from it. They understand that a large percentage of American voters don't particularly care if we win or lose, just so long as we leave. The only reason the Democrats are moving to capitalize on this is that the base sentiment exists in large quantity. Blaming them is easy. They're opportunistic politicians. It's what they do.

The real point of concern should be the vast number of Americans whos' support of a complete withdrawl makes the Democratic positions politically viable. If the war was still popular, the Democrats wouldn't utter a peep against it, like in 2003. So, blame the Democrats all you want, but it's our fellow Americans that allow their mentality to thrive.

23 posted on 01/21/2007 9:19:02 AM PST by Steel Wolf (As Ibn Warraq said, "There are moderate Muslims but there is no moderate Islam.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

Daggone you gotta like Brit Hume. Smart fella.


29 posted on 01/21/2007 9:46:57 AM PST by advance_copy (Stand for life, or nothing at all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
That was a great exchange I saw this morning and it was obvious Juan was lying about the Rats wanting success. All he could go back to was the old it's been wrong before junkola.
31 posted on 01/21/2007 10:13:57 AM PST by tobyhill (The War on Terrorism is not for the weak.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

Krystol and Brit havd this thing exactly right and it's high time people start saying it...over and over and over and over!!!!


32 posted on 01/21/2007 1:39:52 PM PST by jackv (just shakin' my head)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

It's about time someone said it out loud.


33 posted on 01/21/2007 1:57:17 PM PST by Valin (History takes time. It is not an instant thing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson