Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Storm Hits Weather Community Over Climate Expert's Global Warming Claims
Fox.com ^ | 01/22/2007

Posted on 01/22/2007 1:07:31 PM PST by devane617

WASHINGTON — The Weather Channel is standing by a staff climatologist who is taking some heat after blogging that TV weather forecasters who are skeptical man-made global warming should lose their professional certification. Climate expert Heidi Cullen defended herself last week in The Weather Channel One Degree Climate Change blog after questioning the fitness of meteorologists who disagree with her conclusions. "I've read all your comments saying I want to silence meteorologists who are skeptical of the science of global warming. That is not true," wrote Cullen, host of "The Climate Code with Dr. Heidi Cullen," a weekly global warming program on The Weather Channel. "The point of my post was never to stifle discussion. It was to raise it to a level that doesn't confuse science and politics. Freedom of scientific expression is essential." Cullen raised Cain last month when she suggested that the American Meteorological Society decertify meteorologists who don't warn about climate change. "If a meteorologist has an AMS Seal of Approval, which is used to confer legitimacy to TV meteorologists, then meteorologists have a responsibility to truly educate themselves on the science of global warming," Cullen wrote in the blog. "If a meteorologist can't speak to the fundamental science of climate change, then maybe the AMS shouldn't give them a seal of approval."

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: ams; globalwarming; heidicullen; weather; weatherchannel
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-59 next last
This is an exert from the Fox.com page. This is an update to a story posted a few days ago. Looks like Dr. Cullen is taking a bit of heat.
1 posted on 01/22/2007 1:07:32 PM PST by devane617
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: devane617

Isn't like she couldn't take a bit of time in the beauty salon.


2 posted on 01/22/2007 1:12:14 PM PST by Ouderkirk (Don't you think it's interesting how death and destruction seems to happen wherever Muslims gather.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: devane617
Dr. Cullen is a disingenuous fool, who managed to get her
tit caught in the wringer.
3 posted on 01/22/2007 1:12:58 PM PST by Hans
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: devane617

Looks like Dr. Cullen is taking a bit of heat!

Punny!

TWC should have a presenter from the opposite viewpoint. Nothing like a monopoly on unproven scientific gobbledygook.


4 posted on 01/22/2007 1:14:00 PM PST by sodpoodle (Official Thread Nanny)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: devane617

She should shut up and thereby earn some carbon credits.


5 posted on 01/22/2007 1:14:43 PM PST by Shermy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hans

I hate to see the Weather Channel get caught up in politics. They provide a needed news service, and like my beliefs about news services, it should not be biases. They have enough to talk about by presenting the facts while staying away from a political agenda.


6 posted on 01/22/2007 1:14:50 PM PST by devane617 (It's McCain and a Rat -- Now what?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: devane617

Taking a cue from Rosie and The Donald, Cullen has drawn attention to herself and her obscure show by being outrageous. So much for science.


7 posted on 01/22/2007 1:19:12 PM PST by Brad from Tennessee (Anything a politician gives you he has first stolen from you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: devane617

"I hate to see the Weather Channel get caught up in politics."

Never forget it was Democrats who made the weather a political issue. Of course, it is partially Republicans' fault for not pointing their fingers and laughing every time a Democrat brought it up. ;-)


8 posted on 01/22/2007 1:20:31 PM PST by L98Fiero (A fool who'll waste his life, God rest his guts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: devane617
I hate to see the Weather Channel get caught up in politics.

You can't keep liberals from destroying your lives. I say there are as big of an enemy as the Islamos.

9 posted on 01/22/2007 1:20:46 PM PST by Digger (If RINO is your selection, then failure is your election)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: devane617
According to an editorial Drudge posted over the weekend Con Job at the Weather Channel, the channel is deliberately moving left in their coverage of weather

The move away from scientific forecasting of the weather to sensationalized leftist political advocacy is in part due to the influence of Wonya Lucas, executive vice president and general manager of The Weather Channel Networks.

Lucas admitted in a recent interview with Media Village that the reprogramming of The Weather Channel was influenced by her tenure at CNN when that network shifted from presenting straight news to personality-driven programming.

Lucas decided that what was good for CNN was good for The Weather Channel, and the objectivity and respectability of the network has now been thrown out the window. It doesn't matter that CNN's turn to the left has caused their ratings to plummet; The Weather Channel's embraced its model

10 posted on 01/22/2007 1:22:08 PM PST by Republican Red (if you don't want to root for the home team then get the hell out of the stadium)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: devane617
This is why we watch the Weather Channel


11 posted on 01/22/2007 1:22:57 PM PST by Ouderkirk (Don't you think it's interesting how death and destruction seems to happen wherever Muslims gather.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hans

Ouch, the mental picture.....


12 posted on 01/22/2007 1:23:52 PM PST by b4its2late (Liberalism is a hollow log and a mental disorder.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: devane617

The WC should make Dr. Cullen the permanent Stand-Up Hurricane reporter.


13 posted on 01/22/2007 1:24:07 PM PST by AU72
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: devane617
"I've read all your comments saying I want to silence meteorologists who are skeptical of the science of global warming. That is not true,"

Absolutely. She only wants to strip you of your credibility.
14 posted on 01/22/2007 1:24:41 PM PST by cripplecreek (Peace without victory is a temporary illusion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ouderkirk

Yes!


15 posted on 01/22/2007 1:24:53 PM PST by b4its2late (Liberalism is a hollow log and a mental disorder.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Ouderkirk

Current conditions are, slightly chilly here in the stuido...

16 posted on 01/22/2007 1:26:11 PM PST by SlowBoat407 (A living insult to islam since 1959)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Hans

"Dr. Cullen is a disingenuous fool, who managed to get her
tit caught in the wringer."

LOL! Couldn't have said it better myself ;D!


17 posted on 01/22/2007 1:26:19 PM PST by poobear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Ouderkirk

Wow. Must have been an Alberta Clipper moving through that studio. ;~))


18 posted on 01/22/2007 1:26:28 PM PST by Ditto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Ouderkirk

Global warming? Looks like it is cold in that studio.


19 posted on 01/22/2007 1:26:33 PM PST by patton (Sanctimony frequently reaps its own reward.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: devane617

"FOXNEWS.COM HOME > POLITICS"

The fact that appears above the story is ample evidence that Fox takes this issue as political discussion in spite of Ms. Cullen's denials to that effect.

Science and politics can't mix without adulterating both.


20 posted on 01/22/2007 1:26:36 PM PST by Old Professer (The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, and writes again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-59 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson