Woolsey is sure right. An attack on Iran must destroy its ability to counterattack as well. It must be a sustained attack that in effects makes Iran a defanged military power. The list will be more comprehensive than what I'll write here, but it should include all of its air defense, all of its missiles and long range rockets, all of its air force planes, all of its submarines, all of its ammunition storage areas, all of its military communications systems, and as much of its land combat vehicles as possible. In short, all of its military infrastructure must be destroyed. This air campaign should be an attempt to eliminate Iran as a regional power and and its abiltity to be a supporter of terrorism, and it should force the Iranians to have to deal with the consequences of their nut case presidents global ambitions and the killings he's supporting in Iraq, Lebanon, and Israel. To wit, after this attack Iran's main concern should be within its own borders.
Should also remove ALL of its limited refinery process.
But no collateral damage, right?
Jonathan Netanyahu.
One of the recent threads about the "next holocaust" stated that it would take an American-size effort, with bombing strikes daily for at least a month to destroy the Iranian nuclear program. What do you think ?
Not with the mayor in charge. "olmert", what a disgrace.
An attack on Iran must destroy its ability to counterattack as well. It must be a sustained attack ...