Posted on 01/23/2007 8:54:27 AM PST by thackney
you remind me of the evolution guys who throw false science at you claiming the truth. And you dismiss the facts of actual experience of many good people. Very strange. Why don't you just admitt that you may be wrong on this and really look into Mr. Pogues invention instead of believing lies written about him?
Again:
You won't discuss the science of why you think this works. Why is that?
Amazing!
How do I know?.....because I bought it from him over the internet.....I mortgaged the house and cars to do it...it was too good of an opportunity to pass up....a mere $70,000!!!
I am having buyers remorse though.....can't seem to make a working model......I can't figure out what I'm doing wrong....but when I get it to work, I'll make millions........
Just a question though, Are supercarburators supposed to be made out of wood? Seems a bit peculiar.....oh well....back to my shop!!
Thanks for the laugh.
yes, it's amazing that us conspiracy folks believe these made up stories which happened to appear in various newspapers at the time of Charles Pogues invention. It's all just a fabrication of our crazy imaginations. I actually did talk about the science as I understand it with the vaporization increasing the volume and explosiveness of the fuel. You don't address any of my very valid points including my own experience. And the fact of high mileage vehicles greatly reducing the gas tax that governments collect. I am sure that you under estimate the darkside of people of which many are not even aware of. They think they are doing right by the stockholders and employees. By the way, do you know what the world record for the most mpg's for a car is?
Bigfoot, UFO's and Elvis. What a great proof, just ask Dan Rather about stories.
I actually did talk about the science as I understand it
And the problem is you don't understand it.
with the vaporization increasing the volume
Yes it does. As I explained, if you vaporize inside the combustion chamber, the energy of the expansion is transfered to mechanical energy helping to move the car. If it is done in the carburetor, no transfer to mechanical energy takes place.
and explosiveness of the fuel
As I explained, the speed of the chemical reaction is increased, but the chemical reaction of combustion is still the same reaction. Regardless if the combustion takes place in 5% of the duration of the piston's power cycle or is more evenly spread out over nearly the entire power (expansion) cycle, the energy released is the same. However, the later provides less shock and stress on the mechanical equipment.
You don't address any of my very valid points
I address them over and over and you continue to ignore the responses.
including my own experience
Up to this point, common courtesy has prevented me from calling you a liar. Why is it you do not drive such a high mpg vehicle today?
And the fact of high mileage vehicles greatly reducing the gas tax that governments collect.
Some governments like ours. Other governments like China (who also manufacture automobiles) actually subsidize fuel cost and higher mileage vehicles would lower their governments expense.
I am sure that you under estimate the darkside of people of which many are not even aware of.
Back to the crazy conspiracy theories.
By the way, do you know what the world record for the most mpg's for a car is?
You keep distracting from the basic questions, but go ahead and tell us.
Well, all I can say is if I am lieing about my 100% improvement I am a very sad person indeed. It is true and as I had explained to you, it was told to me by an ebayer who sells hydrogen systems for cars that the oil companies have reformulated the gas making it much more difficult to vaporize. I tried to duplicate the results I got in 1982 but it didn't work. At eagleresearch.com you can see that the world record for most mpg's is 7000. I'm sure it's a very small vehicle but it still totally refutes your arguements. And if you look into their site you will see an honest inventor that is doing alot of good...not a liar either. Hope you will open your mind a little and realize that you have been taught something wrong. Either that or you know the truth and are playing games? I don't know.
Ethanol is widely available now. It has a much higher vapor pressure, far easier to vaporize than gasoline.
I'm sure you will have no trouble at using it to prove your claims.
That is really an amazing statement coming from you. Quite entertaining, really.
Since this web site does not appear to exist, why don't you provide a link? A search for it only comes up with other fantasy stories that reference it, but not the actual site. Looks to me like more cut and paste by conspiracy theorists and no real facts.
whatever...I can't change your mind if you don't believe what is so very obvious with just a little bit of research. I think you're playing games actually...
sorry...it's http://www.eagle-research.com/products.html...I missed the - thing.
If you get interested in reading some actual testing data, you could start with some people who really want find something that works so they can require us to buy it then tax it.
Gas Saving and Emission Reduction Devices Evaluation
http://www.epa.gov/otaq/consumer/reports.htm
I'm sure George Wiseman will provide you with the details of the 7000 mpg world record if you asked him. I think he is pretty busy providing customers with some real mpg improvements to put alot of stuff on his site. Here's another true story of college student competion where the winners achieved over 3000 mpg's. Before you call it a fraud please check it out. It's not made up. I'm sure if there technology were to be put on an average size car it would drop those numbers alot but at over 3000 it would still be incredible by car makers standards. I hope you can admitt that you are just simply misinformed on high mpg's inventions.http://www.drivers.com/article/898/
Be very sure. That competition uses a 3.5 Hp engine.
A small car like the Ford Fusion with the economy engine produces 160 Hp. That is over 45 times 3.5 Hp. You are comparing mustard seeds to Watermelons. That example provides Zero believability to the claim on Eagle-research.com. And which claim are you stating is true and which one is false? They both were equally used with the same lack of information.
I think his is busy proving the wisdom of P.T. Barnum and George Hull has never gone out of style.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.