Posted on 01/23/2007 10:54:07 AM PST by seanmerc
Congress Must Assert Power Over War
Bush Term Will End Before War Does
Helen Thomas, Hearst White House columnist
It's time for Congress to re-assert its sole constitutional authority to declare war. But do the newly empowered lawmakers have the courage?
Both President George W. Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney gave TV interviews Sunday to assert their argument that the commander-in-chief has the right to continue the war against Iraq even if it is against the will of the American people and Congress.
The president is obviously playing for time. Bush is losing ground with more and more members of Congress who are resisting the escalation of what is looking like a no-win war. Bush must be finding it very lonely at the top.
Of course, it is up to the lawmakers to cut off his "troop surge" escalation by blocking funding for more troops but not the money in the pipeline to bring the troops home. The lawmakers certainly would be supporting the troops and saving a lot of lives if they did so.
However, Congress may face a fait accompli because the Pentagon has already dispatched some of the 21,500 new troops to take up the battle, long before Congress has been able to act.
The reality is that most lawmakers are spooked by Bush's dire warning that a U.S. withdrawal would be a disaster and would encourage terrorism. They also have fallen into the trap -- so reminiscent of Vietnam -- that we're there, therefore we have to stay there.
No, we don't.
In his Jan. 10 speech to the nation, the president also said that the consequences of U.S. "failure" in Iraq would lead to chaos and the toppling of moderate governments, with radical extremists getting their hands on oil revenues "to fund their ambitions."
Furthermore, he said, "Iran would be emboldened in its pursuit of nuclear weapons" and "our enemies would have a safe haven from which to plan and launch attacks on the American people."
So our troops in Iraq have to keep killing and more Americans have to die to forestall Bush's worst predictions. Some analysts believe that Bush is trying to stay the course for his remaining two years in office and then pass the blame for failure to the Iraqi government and leave the problem of an exit strategy to the Democrats.
In his speech to the nation, it was big of Bush to say, "Where mistakes have been made, the responsibility rests with me."
His first mistake was the disastrous decision to invade Iraq under false pretenses, then to compound the fiasco by inflicting a military occupation on the country which has led to a bloody civil war. The United Nations reported earlier this week that more than 34,000 Iraqis were killed in violence last year.
To hear Bush tell it on CBS-TV "60 minutes," he's going to do what he wants to do in Iraq, no matter what.
"I fully understand they could try to stop me from doing (sending more troops to Iraq). But I've made my decision and we're going forward," he said.
Cheney told Fox News Sunday that congressional criticism will not influence Bush's plans, and he rejected any effort to "run a war by committee."
"The president is commander-in-chief," said Cheney. "He's the one to make these tough decisions."
I've got news for the vice president. The majority of the American people, according to the polls, and a growing sentiment in Congress, cannot be shrugged off as a committee.
What's scary is Bush's vanity. The war cannot be reduced to his personal feelings or popularity. It has caused so much suffering and misery.
He told CBS-TV, "I'm not going to try to be popular and change (my) principles to do so." And what are those principles, pray tell? Could they be to never admit failure?
He also said: "I'm not the kind of guy who says, 'Oh gosh, I'm worried about my legacy.'"
Right, that's already been determined.
(Helen Thomas can be reached at the e-mail address hthomas@hearstdc.com).
She's an object lesson in objective journalism.
Who does this idiot want them to declare war on now?
I believe that is "Battling Bovine Battleaxe".
Had there been a formal declaration of War to begin with (as required by the Constitution), none of this would be an issue.
I stand corrected. We all know what bovines produce, right? :-)
Ah, but it's Helen Thomas. Ne-VER-mind.
Congressman Billybob
The only power Congress has is to cut off the money and they aren't going to do that, sorry battleaxe.
Way too many Helen pics on this thread! Yuck!
Wrong. When you are ineligible to run for office and your VP is not a consideration for '08, you have the political freedom to ignore anything but the constitution.....and it says he's CIC.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.