BREAKING: Senate panel approves nonbinding measure opposing Bush's Iraq plan

MSNBC.COM ^ | 1/24/2007 | MSNBC

[Smogger]

Senate panel approves nonbinding measure opposing Bush's Iraq plan

[Smogger]

That's all so far.

[AmericaUnited]

YAWN...

[sono]

[jrooney]

12-9. Which republican needs to be soundly defeated if they run for re-election?

[RightWhale]

It's only a committee.

[TexasCajun]

Which Republicans signed on?

[AmericaUnited]

This is just so pathetically childish.

[Smogger]

WASHINGTON - The Democratic-controlled Senate Foreign Relations Committee dismissed President Bush’s plans to increase troops strength in Iraq on Wednesday as “not in the national interest,” an unusual wartime repudiation of the commander-in-chief.

The vote was 12-9 and largely along party lines.

“We better be damn sure we know what we’re doing, all of us, before we put 22,000 more Americans into that grinder,” said Sen. Chuck Hagel of Nebraska, the only Republican on the committee to announce support for the measure.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/16785663/

[COEXERJ145]

Gotta be Hagel.

[COEXERJ145]

Hmm, that was too predictable.

[pnh102]

BREAKING: Senate panel approves nonbinding measure opposing Bush's Iraq plan binding measure supporting Al Qaeda

Fixed it for them.

[Thrownatbirth]

The real headline:
BREAKING: Senate panel approves nonbinding measure to give aid and comfort to the enemy

[TommyDale]

Here's a shocker to the Democrats and to this Senate panel:
President Bush is Commander-in-Chief, not you! LOL!

[jrooney]

Please let Hagel run for the presidency so that he can be soundly defeated and publicly humiliated and embarrassed for the world to see. He is nothing but a disloyal ungrateful POS.

[jrooney]

Yes indeed.

[XR7]

And so, it begins.....

[ImpBill]

My thoughts exactly!

[Howlin]

You can bet Hagel did; even if he's not on the committee.

[italianquaker]

Headline could of read, MAJORITY party continues to play word games while our troops are at war.
Cut funding or STFU

[NeoCaveman]

12-9. Which republican needs to be soundly defeated if they run for re-election?

Hagel, I'm sure.