Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Evolution battles caused by politically powerful
WorldNetDaily ^ | January 24, 2007 1:00 a.m. Eastern | Bob Unruh

Posted on 01/24/2007 3:02:32 PM PST by Tim Long

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121 next last
To: gcruse
to form a common worldview while young than have to start from scratch as an adult confronted with an unwelcome reality.

Evolution is not "reality". It's speculation. What you are saying is you want my tax dollars to fund propaganda being shoved down the throats of my children to indoctrinate them to your viewpoint (and many scientists admitedly) because the childs minds are much more pliable when they are young. In other words -- brainwashing.

61 posted on 01/25/2007 4:24:02 PM PST by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Tim Long

School reform or choice is really no different from our current system - it's just that different schools will emphasize various "career interests."
The only way to have education freedom is to allow private schools to compete equally with public schools and have vouchers. And please, allow these private schools to actually teach from a christian worldview!


62 posted on 01/25/2007 4:30:17 PM PST by caffe (please, no more consensus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tacticalogic

Nah- just lurkin waiting for soem actual relevent discussion questions.

Thanks


63 posted on 01/25/2007 6:47:45 PM PST by CottShop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: plain talk

Basically yeah- that's the bottom line. Good points.


64 posted on 01/25/2007 6:49:08 PM PST by CottShop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: CottShop
Nah- just lurkin waiting for soem actual relevent discussion questions.

I'm sure you have all the right answers queued up.

65 posted on 01/25/2007 7:31:05 PM PST by tacticalogic ("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: tacticalogic
Main Entry: re·li·gion Pronunciation: ri-'li-j&n Function: noun Etymology: Middle English religioun, from Anglo-French religiun, Latin religion-, religio supernatural constraint, sanction, religious practice, perhaps from religare to restrain, tie back -- more at RELY 1 a : the state of a religious b (1) : the service and worship of God or the supernatural (2) : commitment or devotion to religious faith or observance 2 : a personal set or institutionalized system of religious attitudes, beliefs, and practices 3 archaic : scrupulous conformity : CONSCIENTIOUSNESS 4 : a cause, principle, or system of beliefs held to with ardor and faith from www.w-m.com secularism falls under #4 definion of religon.. yet calls itself non-religion based on #1, secularism/athiesm just annoints man (by default Government) highest authority.
66 posted on 01/31/2007 9:50:42 AM PST by flevit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: tacticalogic

sorry about the run on there are some added comments towards the end that get lost in the runon.. format didn't transfer over well..
mainly secularism fits # 4 definition...
calls its self non-religion based on # 1....


67 posted on 01/31/2007 9:53:06 AM PST by flevit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: CottShop
drop the symantics

They are still doing well in spite of free market competition and some complaints that they run too much in the foreground.

68 posted on 01/31/2007 9:54:32 AM PST by RightWhale (Repeal the law of the excluded middle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: flevit
secularism falls under #4 definion of religon.. yet calls itself non-religion based on #1, secularism/athiesm just annoints man (by default Government) highest authority.

I understand that. But the argument that secularism and Christianity are both religions is an exercise in sophistry, easily demonstrated by the fact that the same definition of "religion" is not being applied to both.

I work in IT, and it's fairly common among programmers to speak of strict adherance to a particular programming methodology or structure as "religious". That doesn't mean that anyone went out and joined the Church of Python.

69 posted on 01/31/2007 10:21:07 AM PST by tacticalogic ("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: tacticalogic

actually #4 can be applied to both, christianity and secularism fall under that definition.

you'll have to point where in ANY of the definition, require joining a "church".





70 posted on 01/31/2007 10:42:27 AM PST by flevit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: flevit
actually #4 can be applied to both, christianity and secularism fall under that definition.

So do a great many other things, as demonstrated by the example I provided. Are you prepared to deal with the consequences of making anything that would fit that description a "religion" for the purposes of this debate, including the legal and constitutional issues involving "religion"? Will you submit that all of these things have a legitimate place in, and deserve equal treatment in the Religion forum on this board?

71 posted on 01/31/2007 10:47:15 AM PST by tacticalogic ("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor

Seclorum actually means "of the ages". Not sure what that has to do with humanism (or black helecopters).


72 posted on 01/31/2007 11:01:27 AM PST by stormer (Get your bachelors, masters, or doctorate now at home in your spare time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: tacticalogic

I didn't create this site nor did I title the forum, you will have to ask JR. precisely because of the ambiguity of the term, If it were my site I never have a "religion" forum.

I mean a term that can accurately include such mutually exclusive beliefs, such as belief that man is the highest authority/intellect, and one that God is the highest authority/intellect. hardly gets to the truth of the main premises.


73 posted on 01/31/2007 11:58:40 AM PST by flevit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: flevit
I mean a term that can accurately include such mutually exclusive beliefs, such as belief that man is the highest authority/intellect, and one that God is the highest authority/intellect. hardly gets to the truth of the main premises.

Okay. Now, does every instance of the term "secular" meet that criteria?

74 posted on 01/31/2007 12:35:13 PM PST by tacticalogic ("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: tacticalogic
no
there are many usage of "secular" one is "through the ages", it would depend on the context and usage, in common usage with politics/policies, "secularism" implies the underlying belief that man is highest authority/intellect through declaration (atheism) or irrelevance, for practical purposes, there is not much difference with the premise of nonexistence or irrelevance, both still rely on men as final authority.

I hope that answers it but I wasn't sure on which "criteria" you were referring too.
75 posted on 01/31/2007 1:27:01 PM PST by flevit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: flevit
in common usage with politics/policies, "secularism" implies the underlying belief that man is highest authority/intellect through declaration (atheism) or irrelevance, for practical purposes, there is not much difference with the premise of nonexistence or irrelevance, both still rely on men as final authority.

Which of these definitions of "secular" are you asserting is the common usage, and implies a denial of God?

Main Entry: 1sec·u·lar

Pronunciation: 'se-ky&-l&r
Function: adjective
Etymology: Middle English, from Anglo-French seculer, from Late Latin saecularis, from saeculum the present world, from Latin, generation, age, century, world; akin to Welsh hoedl lifetime
1 a : of or relating to the worldly or temporal b : not overtly or specifically religious c : not ecclesiastical or clerical
2 : not bound by monastic vows or rules; specifically : of, relating to, or forming clergy not belonging to a religious order or congregation
3 a : occurring once in an age or a century b : existing or continuing through ages or centuries c : of or relating to a long term of indefinite duration

76 posted on 01/31/2007 1:49:37 PM PST by tacticalogic ("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: tacticalogic

1a, when applied to premises behind politics and policies as I stated

worldly and temporal, man is highest authority/intellect,

religiously following a worldly and temporal premise seems to exclude "heavenly" and infinite.


77 posted on 01/31/2007 2:58:54 PM PST by flevit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: tacticalogic

so as not to distract,
better put "relying on worldly and temporal premise, implies an exclusion of "heavenly" and infinite


78 posted on 01/31/2007 3:06:09 PM PST by flevit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: flevit
1a, when applied to premises behind politics and policies as I stated

worldly and temporal, man is highest authority/intellect,

religiously following a worldly and temporal premise seems to exclude "heavenly" and infinite.

And you submit that in the political arena, when people make reference to "secular government", or describing any particular policy as "secular" they are using that definition and meaning, rather than b : not overtly or specifically religious ?

On what do you base this assertion, and on what basis do you amend the definition to make it explicitly theistic?

79 posted on 01/31/2007 3:26:28 PM PST by tacticalogic ("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: tacticalogic

by the actions and words of those that claim to be secular, they adhere to a system of belief that preaches the exclution of a heavenly and infinite authority from having any authority over policies and politics..

its been fun must get going.


80 posted on 01/31/2007 4:10:51 PM PST by flevit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson