Posted on 01/25/2007 5:12:26 AM PST by RAY
One of the truest sentences I've read recently:
He stood there alone and spoke eloquently to a Congress, to a nation, of spoiled brats.
So you're ignoring the fact that Iraq's WMD probably went to Syria, according to each person who has been assigned to finding those weapons.
You're ignoring the fact that Saddam was the ATM to terrorists and the world was alarmed at the growing relationship between Saddam and OBL in the 90's.
You're ignoring the fact that Clinton's former CIA director and Clinton's former terrorism and Iraq expert, both of whom know a bit more about terrorism than you, think that Iraq uses "false flags".
You're also ignoring the body of evidence that three people convicted of the 1993 World Trade Center bombing had Iraqi passports.
I assume you'll keep pretending that Saddam was secular, despite the fact he wrote the Koran in his own blood.
And no, the argument is NOT that Islamic terrorists are an Iraqi front. The argument by Woolsey, Mylroie and others is that Iraq has used people before to be the fall guy in the event of capture. So it would look like a particular group was responsible for an event, not a nation state.
There seems to be a lot about all this you don't know.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.