[Cicero]

Well, I'm with you on why clinton didn't want this exposed, and I'm with you on the continuing problems in the FBI, which was complicit in many of these things. But why is Bush playing the game?

[tarheelswamprat]

re:Well, I'm with you on why clinton didn't want this exposed, and I'm with you on the continuing problems in the FBI, which was complicit in many of these things. But why is Bush playing the game? and ...

What I kept looking for as I read your post was your explanation for why the Bush Justice Department is as corrupt as Clinton's was, and even more importantly, why Bush is apparently too weak to do anything about it.

lawdude gave you all the clue to the answers to your questions in post #32.

[BILL_C]

But why is Bush playing the game?

See my post 102 on this subject, WHY Bush does NOT reveal Clinton covering up terrorists attacks in the 1990's?

Bush II must see his hands are tied by the setup that Clinton left. Clinton empowered the Arabs by showing us to be a paper tiger. One response to my post 102 brought up that Clinton kept us on airlines, kept us spending and believing in our economy.

But the Arabs escalated the stakes into 9/11.

Clinton should have responded to the terrorist attacks during his presidency but he didn't. Clinton treated the attacks as criminal events, not attacks on the United States by a foreign government. If you look at the ad in post 95, WHY IS THE NTSB, THE CIA, THE FBI lying?, you'll see hundreds of witnesses spending their money trying to expose the coverup but obviously they failed. But the fact is hundreds of witnesses with many having excellent military backgrounds who would surely be able to recognize a missile hitting an airliner.

The point is, the Democrats and the Republicans are all in the same house of cards. IF they are ever exposed in any of these charades, then the house of cards is going to come crumbling down, and it's going to hit everyone there. Virtually nobody believes the obvious, but when the going gets rough the lying starts, and the members of the press are too stupid, or spineless, to call them on it.

I wrote a story on Sandy Berger in 2004 when the story first broke. IT was obvious to me then and it remains obvious today that Clinton simply made a decision to coverup the terrorist attacks during his presidency.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1175272/posts