Is it REALLY too much to ask for the republicans to nominate a solid conservative? Must they continually provide choices that we have to vote for as the lesser of two evils?
--
It's about 'electability', yaknow..
some who harbor socialistic tendencies (and won't admit or even realize it in some instances) have to be appeased, and some of them then have the chutzpah to accuse the "unappeasables" aka "Purists" aka True conservatives of being the ones on shaky grounds.. Go figure.
If they were true to the conservative agenda in the first place at election time, we wouldn't have these non-stop peeing contests here and could get down to the issues at hand, but some are here to distract everyone else from that actually happening, jmo...
We live in strange times.
Ain't that the truth!