Jeffrey N. Shane, undersecretary for DOT
Posted on 01/26/2007 6:42:51 AM PST by Paul Ross
Plan for superhighway ripped as 'urban legend'
Congressman, DOT undersecretary disagree over threat to sovereignty
By Jerome R. Corsi
January 26, 2007, WorldNetDaily.com
Jeffrey N. Shane, undersecretary for DOT
Jeffrey N. Shane, undersecretary for DOT Congressmen and a policy official of the Department of Transportation engaged in a spirited exchange over whether NAFTA Super Highways were a threat to U.S. sovereignty or an imaginary "Internet conspiracy," such as the "black helicopter myths," advanced by fringe lunatics.
At a meeting Wednesday of the Subcommittee on Highways and Transit of the U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, Jeffrey N. Shane, undersecretary of transportation for policy at the U.S. Department of Transportation, testified.
During the questioning by committee members, Rep. Ted Poe, R-Texas, asked Shane about the existence of plans for a "NAFTA superhighway."
Shane responded he was "not familiar with any plan at all, related to NAFTA or cross-border traffic."
After further questioning by Poe, Shane stated reports of NAFTA superhighways or corridors were "an urban legend."
At this, the chairman, Rep. Peter DeFazio, D-Ore., questioned aloud whether Shane was just "gaming semantics" when responding to Poe's question.
"Mr. Shane was either blissfully ignorant or he may have been less than candid with the committee," Poe told WND in a telephone interview.
Asked about the Department of Transportation's work with Dallas-based trade group NASCO, the North American SuperCorridor Coalition Inc., and the Texas Department of Transportation plans to build the Trans-Texas Corridor, Poe told WND "the NAFTA superhighway plans exist to move goods from Mexico through the United States to Canada. It appears to be another one of the open-border philosophies that chips away at American sovereignty, all in the name of so-called trade."
Poe said there are security obstacles to the project that must be addressed.
"I don't understand why the federal government isn't getting public input on this," he said. "We get comments like Mr. Shane's instead of our own government asking the people of the United States what they think about all of this. This big business coming through Mexico may not be good business for the United States."
Poe continued to insist "the public ought to make this decision, especially the states that are affected, such as Texas, Oklahoma, Kansas, and all the way through up to Canada. The public needs to make input on this. So, I don't understand, unless there's some other motive, why the public isn't being told about these plans and why the public is not invited to make input."
Rep. Virgil Goode, R-Va., introduced House Concurrent Resolution 40 earlier this week to express the sense of Congress that the United States should not build a NAFTA superhighway system and should not enter into an agreement with Mexico and Canada to form a North American Union.
Asked to comment on Shane's response to Poe, Goode dismissed Shane's claim that NAFTA superhighways were just another "urban legend."
"Let's take Mr. Shane at his word. Let Mr. Shane come over here from the Department of Transportation and endorse House Concurrent Resolution 40," he said. "If, in his mind he's not doing anything to promote a NAFTA superhighway and he's not doing anything to promote the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America, then he won't mind joining his voice with ours to be in opposition to any such 'urban legend,' as he so calls it."
Goode added this comment in a playful retort to Shane's attempt to dismiss the discussion: "My prediction is Mr. Shane will run for the timber."
In a serious tone, Goode objected to Shane's attempt to play what he agreed was a game of semantics.
"When President Bush had the meeting in Waco, Texas, the three leaders called the new arrangement the 'Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America,' SPP for short," Goode said. "But, as is suggested by Congressman DeFazio at the hearing, the intent of people like Mr. Shane is to use different words and different names as a way to deflect attention from what they are really doing."
Asked about White House Press Secretary Snow's denial that there was any White House plan to create a North American Union, Goode's reply also was direct.
"I guess Mr. Snow is saying that a Security and Prosperity Partnership and a North American Union are not one and the same," he said. "That's just the use of his words, but is he denying that President Bush, President Fox and Prime Minister Martin had the meeting and came up with the Security and Prosperity Partnership in 2005? I doubt it."
Also present in the audience at the subcommittee meeting was Rod Nofzinger, director of Government Affairs for the Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association. Nofzinger told WND Shane's denial struck him as less than genuine. In an e-mail to WND, Nofzinger commented:
"Considering what we know about the Bush administration's efforts to open the border to Mexican trucks and that DOT officials have met with groups such as NASCO, I was truly surprised to hear Mr. Shane say flat out that he had no knowledge of plans or meetings related to NAFTA or cross-border surface trade corridors."
Substantiating Nofzinger's argument is a speech Secretary of Transportation Norman Y. Mineta gave April 30, 2004, at a NASCO forum in Fort Worth, Texas. Mineta told the NASCO meeting:
"NAFTA has opened the doors to expanding and flourishing trade across our borders. Since its implementation, total U.S. trade with Mexico has increased almost 200 percent – with 70 percent of the U.S./Mexico trade passing through Texas.
"There are, however, some things that we still need to do in the United States to fulfill our obligations under the NAFTA treaty. One of them is to finally open the market between Mexico and the United States for trucking and busing."
Mineta continued:
"And to our friends from Mexico who are here today, I say, 'Welcome, and get ready.' Opening the border is of mutual benefit."Specifically referring to Interstate Highways 35, 29 and 94 – the core highways supported by NASCO as a prime "North American Super Corridor" – Mineta commented:
"You also recognized that the success of the NAFTA relationship depends on mobility – on the movement of people, of products, and of capital across borders. "The people in this room have vision. Thinking ahead, thinking long-term, you began to make aggressive plans to develop the NASCO trade corridor – this vital artery in our national transportation through which so much of our NAFTA traffic flows.
"It flows across our nation's busiest southern border crossing in Laredo; over North America's busiest commercial crossing, the Ambassador Bridge in Detroit; and through Duluth, and Pembina, North Dakota, and all the places in between."
In a statement provided WND by e-mail, DeFazio cut past Shane's attempt to dismiss the subject by ridicule, writing:
In the hearing, Undersecretary of Transportation for Policy Jeff Shane, in response to a question from Representative Ted Poe, said the NAFTA superhighway was an urban legend. Whatever the case, it is a fact that highway capacity is growing to and from the border to facilitate trade, and there is no doubt that the volume of imports from Mexico has soared since NAFTA, straining security at the U.S. border. Plans of Asian trading powers to divert cargo from U.S. ports like Los Angeles to ports in Mexico will only put added pressure on border inspectors. The U.S. needs to invest in better border security, including enhanced screening of cargo crossing our land borders.Shane declined to comment for this article.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
After we build the continuous Gulf-of-Mexico to Pacific border fence with Mexico, it would then be a piece of cake to build TWO more fences, one a bit to the east of the Northbound lanes, and one a bit to the west of the Southbound lanes. Its just another couple of thousand miles of fence, no?
...with border patrols at every exit.
Congressman, DOT undersecretary disagree over threat to sovereignty
It is no more of a threat to U.S. sovereignty than another 'urban legend'....the illegal immigrant invasion. /sarc
|
 |
| There's no such thing as a NAFTA SuperHighway | There's no US troops in Iraq |
Good Old Baghdad Bob! Put some specs, a green uniform, and a black beret on Shane, and 'oila, I think you're on to something here!
They want Mexican trucks to roll freely through the U.S. without any U.S. laws getting in the way. The U.S. and its laws will be subordinated to the SPP/NAU "agreement".
Indiana is doing its part. Selling the I80-I90 toll road. The port to fort project, involving building a 4 lane US24 between Fort Wayne IN and Toledo OH. The idea of extending I69 farther south with a toll road around Naptowne. Those illegals can get through the state quickly and be on their way to Detroit and points north and east with rapid progress.
That would be to keep one group of people from running across the highway and getting run over?
Jerome Corsi, WorldNetDaily
Enough said. Jerry thinks the Mexicans are coming to get us all and we'll have a 'North American Union' by Christmas...Toss in Crazy Joe and the black helicopters are warming up on the pad as we speak...
They want Mexican trucks to roll freely through the U.S. without any U.S. laws getting in the way. The U.S. and its laws will be subordinated to the SPP/NAU "agreement".
No really I heard the trucks will be full of Mexicans. That's why they can't inspect them at the border. They're just moving in to take our jobs and don't want anyone to know...sort of like 10,000 Trojan Horses full of people. Sneaky Mexicans.....I just hope they don't complete the highway going north. I mean Mexicans are bad enough but think of the travesty if Canadians invaded us.....we'd be eating back bacon and all drinking Nabob coffee before we knew it!!
LMAO! So, then the critics are correct--the superhighway IS a threat to national sovereignty? Because the black helicopters damned sure weren't myths.
There are fringe lunatics, but this guy should look in the mirror to find one.
We can't build a border fence/security zone but some want to build a 1/4 mile wide, fenced secured and patrolled concrete and asphalt corridor that divides the country in two.
Our leadership's priorities are screwed up and detrimental to the security of this country.
Mexican trucks will have some form of rolling diplomatic immunity. Cool. Now I can buy Bohemia by the truckload in Vera Cruz cheap, and have it delivered without the revenoors getting in the way.
Now, if I could figure out a way to truck beer from Munich.
Making it the Road to Partition. [rimshot]
Coming to your backyard...soon.
I have GOT to get into the Mexican trucking business. I won't even put lamps on mine, and tell them to run at night with absolutely no regard for the speed limit.
"I don't understand why the federal government isn't getting public input on this,"
Because we have elections and don't micromanage policy. If we did, the borders would be secure.
Awww, ya Gotta have the head lamps to give all us Gringos a really good scare!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.